1993
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Externalized Groshong Catheters and Hickman Ports for Central Venous Access in Gynecologic Oncology Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mechanical complications have been reported to occur in approximately 20% of the externalized catheters [8][9][10][11] and 4% of subcutaneous devices [12]. Catheter-related infections are reported in 7 to 32% of patients with Groshong catheters [13][14][15] and in 11 to 45% of patients with Hickman catheters [16][17][18]. In a recent analysis of several published studies, symptomatic thrombosis has been reported with an incidence of 0.3 to 28.3% [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Mechanical complications have been reported to occur in approximately 20% of the externalized catheters [8][9][10][11] and 4% of subcutaneous devices [12]. Catheter-related infections are reported in 7 to 32% of patients with Groshong catheters [13][14][15] and in 11 to 45% of patients with Hickman catheters [16][17][18]. In a recent analysis of several published studies, symptomatic thrombosis has been reported with an incidence of 0.3 to 28.3% [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We administered 5-FU as true boluses with an approximate injection time of 3 min, which may be associated with more adverse events than short (about 15 min) infusions (Andre et al, 2001). We also included VAD-related adverse effects, though they were infrequent in comparison to some other series (Carde et al, 1989;Gleeson et al, 1993;Kock et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the method of insertion may affect the outcome. A number of the studies attempted to compare CVAPD with either Groshong catheters or Hickman catheters and consistently found a higher rate of complications in the central external catheters (Mueller et al, 1992;Gleeson et al, 1993;Groeger et al, 1993;Eastridge and Lefor, 1995) (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%