2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External validation of WGS-based antimicrobial susceptibility prediction tools, KOVER-AMR and ResFinder 4.1, for Escherichia coli clinical isolates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though AMR gene finder tools are designed to identify the presence of AMR genes in genomic data, their results are frequently used to directly infer AMR phenotype in literature [40, 6, 17, 43]. We examined the accuracy of predicting AMR phenotype solely based on the presence/absence of AMR genes for 23 antibiotics and 16,950 genomes, from organisms with laboratory-derived MIC data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though AMR gene finder tools are designed to identify the presence of AMR genes in genomic data, their results are frequently used to directly infer AMR phenotype in literature [40, 6, 17, 43]. We examined the accuracy of predicting AMR phenotype solely based on the presence/absence of AMR genes for 23 antibiotics and 16,950 genomes, from organisms with laboratory-derived MIC data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average precision was 56.2% and the average recall was 61.2%, which highlights key flaws in using the tool to predict AMR phenotype. While RGI is not designed to identify AMR phenotype but rather the AMR genotype, its results are often inferred as phenotypic resistance for genomes [40, 6, 17, 43] and metagenomes [22, 47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the antibiotic classes we evaluated met the FDA criteria for acceptable maj and vmj discrepancy rates. In addition to the possible improvements described above, more granular drug-level classification of ARGs should be a priority for the AMRFinder tool and would likely improve predictive performance (highlighted by the overall slightly better performance of ResFinder in a recent validation study [10] and by better performance of existing tools when using curated gene-drug associations [9,28]). Our study also highlights potential phenotypic differences for alleles of AMR-associated gene families which differ by synonymous mutations, suggesting that classification of ARGs using amino-acid sequences alone should be avoided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated the performance of such databases to predict phenotype from genotype for E. coli [8, 9], demonstrating the associated challenges. Verschuuren et al recently demonstrated the inability of the Resfinder tool to meet FDA specifications for very major/major error rates for most antibiotics (n=234 isolates, selected for resistance to third-generation cephalosporins[10]). This work highlighted particularly poor performance predicting AMR phenotype for beta lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL-BLI) combination drugs, replicating a finding from earlier studies[11, 12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate WGS-based profiling of complete AMR gene content and prediction of susceptibility phenotypes would represent an attractive option for other commonly encountered clinical bacterial pathogens, such as Enterobacterales, including Escherichia coli . However, many of these pathogens, together with the antimicrobials commonly used to treat them, have proved more challenging, with methods designed for this yet to meet the standards required to be used in clinical practice [4–6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%