2023
DOI: 10.1159/000528968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External Validation of the IHS4-55 in a European Antibiotic-Treated Hidradenitis Suppurativa Cohort

Abstract: Background: Previously, a new dichotomous outcome was developed, calculated as 55% reduction in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa 4 score (IHS4-55). It was validated in datasets of adalimumab and placebo treated HS patients. External validation is an important aspect of clinical outcomes. Objectives: We aimed to externally validate the novel dichotomous IHS4-55 in a non-biologic treated dataset of HS patients. Methods: Data from a previously published European-wide prospective clinical study of antibi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, the newly developed scoring system, IHS4‐55, which was created to overcome the limitation of HiSCR in patients with an abscess‐nodular count (AN) <3 accompanied by numerous draining tunnels, exhibits comparable discriminatory efficacy to HiSCR in capturing the optimal treatment response (Supplementary S2). 17 In our series, this phenomenon was observed 6 months into the therapy, despite displaying a slower rate of change during the initial 3 months of treatment. At last, there was only a modest impact on the improvement of patients' quality of life, with a mild benefit not reaching statistically significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Thirdly, the newly developed scoring system, IHS4‐55, which was created to overcome the limitation of HiSCR in patients with an abscess‐nodular count (AN) <3 accompanied by numerous draining tunnels, exhibits comparable discriminatory efficacy to HiSCR in capturing the optimal treatment response (Supplementary S2). 17 In our series, this phenomenon was observed 6 months into the therapy, despite displaying a slower rate of change during the initial 3 months of treatment. At last, there was only a modest impact on the improvement of patients' quality of life, with a mild benefit not reaching statistically significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…All respective comparisons for the relative changes of IHS4 score, AN and dT counts from baseline were done by the Student’s t test. A 55% or more decrease in the baseline IHS4 has recently been suggested as an alternative efficacy endpoint [8, 9]. Comparisons for this endpoint were done by the Fisher’s exact test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%