2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09255-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External validation of an MR-based radiomic model predictive of locoregional control in oropharyngeal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings highlight the dependency of perceived harmonization performance on the choice of classifier and may in part explain why some studies did not report improved classification performance following ComBat harmonization. 32 Contrary to binary classification, that is, separation of only 2 classes, such as benign and malignant lesions, 5,33 or prediction of locoregional spread or control, 17,18 treatment response or relapse at a given time-point, [19][20][21]30 for which ComBat has been successfully used, our use of 3 tissue types with visually similar signal intensity and homogeneity on MRI makes the classification task more complex. Classification was further made difficult by our choice of T1-weighted Dixon images for radiomic feature extraction, where signal intensities showed only minor visible differences between tissues of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings highlight the dependency of perceived harmonization performance on the choice of classifier and may in part explain why some studies did not report improved classification performance following ComBat harmonization. 32 Contrary to binary classification, that is, separation of only 2 classes, such as benign and malignant lesions, 5,33 or prediction of locoregional spread or control, 17,18 treatment response or relapse at a given time-point, [19][20][21]30 for which ComBat has been successfully used, our use of 3 tissue types with visually similar signal intensity and homogeneity on MRI makes the classification task more complex. Classification was further made difficult by our choice of T1-weighted Dixon images for radiomic feature extraction, where signal intensities showed only minor visible differences between tissues of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 For clinical MRI data, ComBat has so far predominantly been used for binary classification tasks, that is, separation of just 2 tissue, lesion, or outcome classes. 3,5,6,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21] In the present study, our aim was therefore to determine the value of ComBat harmonization of clinical MRI radiomic data from 2 centers for nonbinary tissue classification by machine learning. Further, we aimed to compare the performances of 2 ComBat variants, as well as the effects of harmonization on radiomic features of different categories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation