Aquatic Oligochaete Biology VIII 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0597-5_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External structures used during attachment and sperm transfer in tubificids (Annelida, Oligochaeta)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar sense organs are scattered on their entire surface or more or less organized into one or more intercalated rows. Ciliate sense organs were also observed on the genital region, including the singular anchorage bridge recently described by Cuadrado and Martínez-Ansemil (2001); sense organs of short cilia (1.4 -3.4 m long) are especially abundant near the penial chaetae.…”
Section: Tubificidaementioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar sense organs are scattered on their entire surface or more or less organized into one or more intercalated rows. Ciliate sense organs were also observed on the genital region, including the singular anchorage bridge recently described by Cuadrado and Martínez-Ansemil (2001); sense organs of short cilia (1.4 -3.4 m long) are especially abundant near the penial chaetae.…”
Section: Tubificidaementioning
confidence: 59%
“…In the last three decades, a few studies using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed some data concerning morphology and distribution of external sense organs in almost 20 species of oligochaetes, but with respect to the freshwater ones, only two species of tubificids and one species of branchiobdellid (a monophyletic group of Clitellata whose inclusion among the Oligochaeta is still under debate) were studied in detail (Farnesi et al, 1982a,b;Smith, 1983); partial data were also given for three other species of freshwater tubificids (Chapman, 1979;Cuadrado and Martínez-Ansemil, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, we are far from understanding the reproductive biology of these animals and cannot even guess at the interrelations between the form and function of external genital structures in these hermaphroditic organisms. The paper by Cuadrado & Martinez-Ansemil (2001), although dealing with limnetic tubificid species, gives an example about differentiation of structures required for copulation and sperm exchange. Our lack of knowledge in this field is apparent in those species where number and position of genital organs and openings deviates from normal (e.g., mid-dorsal opening of spermathecae).…”
Section: Reproductive Biologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This category includes the dart‐shaped ‘love darts’ (Fig. F) of stylommatophoran land snails (Davison et al ., ; Koene & Schulenburg, ), the copulatory setae in earthworms (Cuadrado & Martinez‐Ansemil, ; Koene et al ., ), the teeth of plethodontid salamanders involved in copulatory biting (Houck & Reagan, ; Rollmann, Houck & Feldhoff, ; Houck & Arnold, ), the sting of scorpions that display a ‘sexual sting’ ritual (Inceoglu et al ., ), and male fang use in a wolf spider (Johns et al ., ). Consistent with the paternity‐benefit hypothesis, mucus delivered with the snail's love dart has been shown to increase a successful shooter's fertilisation success (Chase & Blanchard, ), while setal gland products in earthworms increase the partner's refractory period and sperm uptake (Koene et al ., ), and secretions transferred during copulatory biting in salamanders increase current receptivity and shorten time to sperm transfer (Houck & Reagan, ; Rollmann et al ., ).…”
Section: Categorisation Of Traumatic Mating Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%