External spur gear root bending stress: A comparison of ISO 6336:2006, AGMA 2101-D04, ANSYS finite element analysis and strain gauge techniques

Lisle, Timothy; Shaw, Brian; Frazer, R C

doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.01.006

Cited by 75 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…ISO, VDI, AGMA, FEA and strain gauge comparison Due to the difference in the predicted location of maximum root bending stress established in accordance with each of the analytical methods, it was decided to validate the theory against experimentally generated strain gauge results on an actual gear tooth, in addition to FEA. To minimise the errors associated with the positional accuracy of strain gauging normal module gear teeth in locations of high stress gradients, as has been previously discussed 18 , a large module internal gear with a 4 meter reference diameter was manufactured, the details of which are presented in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 2(a). Note that only partial adjacent gear teeth were manufactured, as has previously been investigated so as not to introduce stress analysis errors 18 .…”

Section: Iso Vdi and Agma Root Bending Stressmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To minimise the errors associated with the positional accuracy of strain gauging normal module gear teeth in locations of high stress gradients, as has been previously discussed 18 , a large module internal gear with a 4 meter reference diameter was manufactured, the details of which are presented in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 2(a). Note that only partial adjacent gear teeth were manufactured, as has previously been investigated so as not to introduce stress analysis errors 18 . The gear tooth profile was wire cut from hardened (approximately 650Hv) and ground gauge plate with a profile tolerance of ± 50μm.…”

Section: Iso Vdi and Agma Root Bending Stressmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Internal spur gear root bending stress: A comparison of ISO 6336:1996, ISO 6336:2006, VDI 2737:2005, AGMA, ANSYS finite element analysis and strain gauge techniques

Lisle

Shaw

Frazer

2018

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Association of German Engineers VDI 2737:2005 and the International Organisation for Standardisation ISO 6336:2006 are universally accepted analytical procedures for the analysis of internal gears. There is no official American Gear Manufacturers Association standard for internal gear stress analysis due to the validity of inscribing the Lewis parabola within internal concave profiles and the resulting errors associated with the location of maximum root bending stress. This research investigates the differences associated with using ISO 6336, VDI 2737 and an unofficial American Gear Manufacturers Association method, all of which are compared against a potentially more accurate numerical (ANSYS) method and strain gauge techniques.

show abstract

Section: Iso Vdi and Agma Root Bending Stressmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Iso Vdi and Agma Root Bending Stressmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internal spur gear root bending stress: A comparison of ISO 6336:1996, ISO 6336:2006, VDI 2737:2005, AGMA, ANSYS finite element analysis and strain gauge techniques

Lisle

Shaw

Frazer

2018

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Where some researchers investigated, experimentally and analytically, the influence of pitch deviations on the loading capacity of spur gears (Franulovic, Markovic, Vrcan, & Soban, 2017). On the other hand, the external spur gear root bending stress studied using ANSYS finite element analysis and strain gauge techniques (Lisle, Shaw, & Frazer, 2017). Recently an optimization variables consisted of the gear module, the face width, the pinion and wheel profile shift coefficients and the number of teeth of the pinion showed by (Miler, Žeželj, Lončar, & Vučković, 2018).…”

Section: Fig (1) : Schematic Diagram Of Spur Gear Motionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contact Stress Analysis of Spur Gear Under the Different Rotational Speed by Theoretical and Finite Element Method

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study that spur gears are chosen, contact stress of spur gear is presented under the effect of rotational speed. Three-dimensional simulation of dynamic analysis of gears designed and modeled using ANSYS software. The dynamic analysis included in the determination of dynamic stresses analysis. Contact stress is theoretically calculated and analyzed and numerically estimated using both Hertzian mathematical model and finite element method respectively. Different values of rotational speed used to study its effect on contact stress. Both methods compared by evaluating the percentage error of contact stress, and the modeling of the spur gear and stress analysis of spur gear carried out using SOLID WORK and ANSYS V14, respectively. The most significant note in this study concludes that increasing speed causes vibration and pitting failure due to repetitions.

show abstract

“…According to the support stiffness of the gear and other factors, refer to optimizing the gear modification [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. This paper would not study the best trimming tooth surface; that is, select two measurements modification gears; it is short for group A and group B in the following paper, and its dynamic performance in analysis.…”

Section: Experiments Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Contact Part of Error Tooth Surface and Dynamic Performance Prediction for Involute Gear

Liu

Wang

2017

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aiming at the problem of constructing digital model of involute gear with error, the method of linear interpolation combined with area weight interpolation is proposed. Based on the non-feature discrete data block technique, the true tooth surface discrete data obtained by the coordinate measuring instrument is divided into blocks, and then the interpolation method is used to interpolate the nonmeasurement area to construct the real tooth surface with errors. The contact part and dynamic performance of the gear are predicted by using the constructed error tooth surface. The contact error of the tooth surface and the transmission error of the gear are verified by the test, and the reliability of the judgment result is judged by measuring the vibration in the direction of the gear meshing line. Compared with the example, this method not only reduces the computational complexity of the interpolation algorithm, but also improves the accuracy of the tooth interpolation data points and the smoothness of the error tooth surface.

show abstract

External spur gear root bending stress: A comparison of ISO 6336:2006, AGMA 2101-D04, ANSYS finite element analysis and strain gauge techniques

Abstract: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence Newcastle University ePrints-eprint.ncl.ac.uk

Cited by 75 publications

References 23 publications

Internal spur gear root bending stress: A comparison of ISO 6336:1996, ISO 6336:2006, VDI 2737:2005, AGMA, ANSYS finite element analysis and strain gauge techniques

Internal spur gear root bending stress: A comparison of ISO 6336:1996, ISO 6336:2006, VDI 2737:2005, AGMA, ANSYS finite element analysis and strain gauge techniques

Contact Stress Analysis of Spur Gear Under the Different Rotational Speed by Theoretical and Finite Element Method

Analysis of Contact Part of Error Tooth Surface and Dynamic Performance Prediction for Involute Gear

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About