2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External Shocks, Structural Change, and Economic Growth in Mexico, 1979–2007

Abstract: This paper finds that shocks to net financial inflows, world oil prices, the U.S. growth rate, and the lagged real exchange rate explain most of the fluctuations in Mexico's annual growth since 1979. The paper also estimates how the effects of these external constraints have changed since Mexico's liberalization policies of the late 1980s and the formation of NAFTA in 1994. Estimates of an investment function and other tests show that growth drives investment but not conversely, in the short run. Investment is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
12

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
27
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research supports the view that the negative effect of real appreciation on growth in the Mexican economy is not only important as we shall see but has increased since trade liberalization and especially since the North American Free Trade Agreement went into effect in 1994 (Galindo and Ros, 2008;Blecker, 2009;11 It is worth noting that this conclusion applies to the period 2002-2013, when the regime was in operation in all five countries of the IT group, but is sensitive to the particular period considered. Also, over this period, Mexico is in fact the only country in the group of inflation targeters that records a moderate real depreciation as a result of the shock of 2008-2009 (or, more precisely, Lehman's collapse).…”
Section: Real Appreciation and Slow Growthsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent research supports the view that the negative effect of real appreciation on growth in the Mexican economy is not only important as we shall see but has increased since trade liberalization and especially since the North American Free Trade Agreement went into effect in 1994 (Galindo and Ros, 2008;Blecker, 2009;11 It is worth noting that this conclusion applies to the period 2002-2013, when the regime was in operation in all five countries of the IT group, but is sensitive to the particular period considered. Also, over this period, Mexico is in fact the only country in the group of inflation targeters that records a moderate real depreciation as a result of the shock of 2008-2009 (or, more precisely, Lehman's collapse).…”
Section: Real Appreciation and Slow Growthsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Between 1996-2000and 2003-2007s GDP growth rate fell by 2.1 percentage points (from around 5% in the first period to 3% in the second one). Blecker (2009) estimates that the real appreciation of the peso (of around 10%) between these two periods reduced the growth rate by as much as 1.3 percentage points. 13 Ibarra (2010Ibarra ( , 2013 also finds a very significant effect of the real exchange rate on investment even after controlling for industrial production and exports, which suggests the presence of an important 'profitability effect' of the real exchange rate.…”
Section: Real Appreciation and Slow Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period under study was characterized by marked fluctuations in the growth rate which were closely related to variations in the U.S. growth rate. In fact, changes in U.S. growth have been one of the factors explaining the variation in Mexico's growth rate since the formation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994 (Blecker 2008). The economy bounced back and resumed growth in the following years, but another sharp decline ensued in 2009 as a consequence of the economic crisis in Europe and the U.S.…”
Section: Economic Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative sign indicates that appreciation of the peso increases the probability that a metropolitan downturn will occur. Similarly, Blecker (2009) finds that peso appreciation reduces economic growth in Mexico at the national level. Other studies have also documented similar exchange rate effects in the export processing sectors of several urban economies in northern Mexico (Coronado et al, 2004;Fullerton and Torres-Ruiz, 2004;Cañas et al, 2007).…”
Section: Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%