Abstract:Assessment of the physical dimension implicit in the soccer match is crucial for the improvement and individualization of training load management. This study aims to: (a) describe the external match load at the amateur level, (b) analyze the differences between playing positions, (c) verify whether the home/away matches and if (d) the phase (first or second) of the championship influence the external load. Twenty amateur soccer players (21.5 ± 1.9 years) were monitored using the global positioning system. The… Show more
“…Moreover, wide defenders and wide midfielders perform the highest sprinting distance, whereas central midfielders and central backs cover the lowest in elite soccer players [21][22][23][24][25]. Moreover, significant differences were found between the various playing positions for all measures of EL in amateur soccer players [26]. Authors reported that central midfielders covered the longest distance during a match, which is in line with recent literature followed by the forwards, the full-backs, and the wide midfielders.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In our study, significant differences in cinematic EL indicators between playing positions during the first half time of an OM were detected. Several previous studies have found differences in EL as distance, speed, and accelerations [38][39][40] between playing positions during both training and competition including both elite and amateur soccer players [26]. Moreover, considering physiological characteristics (i.e., HR and derived indices) [41,42] similar results have been found.…”
Background: Wearable inertial sensors are poorly used in soccer to monitor external load (EL) indicators. However, these devices could be useful for improving sports performance and potentially reducing the risk of injury. The aim of this study was to investigate the EL indicators (i.e., cinematic, mechanical, and metabolic) differences between playing positions (i.e., central backs, external strikers, fullbacks, midfielders, and wide midfielder) during the first half time of four official matches (OMs). Methods: 13 young professional soccer players (Under-19; age: 18.5 ± 0.4 years; height: 177 ± 6 cm; weight: 67 ± 4.8 kg) were monitored through a wearable inertial sensor (TalentPlayers TPDev, firmware version 1.3) during the season 2021–2022. Participants’ EL indicators were recorded during the first half time of four OMs. Results: significant differences were detected in all the EL indicators between playing positions except for two of them (i.e., distance traveled in the various metabolic power zones (<10 w) and the number of direction changes to the right >30° and with speed >2 m). Pairwise comparisons showed differences in EL indicators between playing positions. Conclusions: Young professional soccer players showed different loads and performances during OMs in relation to playing positions. Coaches should consider the different physical demands related to playing positions in order to design the most appropriate training program.
“…Moreover, wide defenders and wide midfielders perform the highest sprinting distance, whereas central midfielders and central backs cover the lowest in elite soccer players [21][22][23][24][25]. Moreover, significant differences were found between the various playing positions for all measures of EL in amateur soccer players [26]. Authors reported that central midfielders covered the longest distance during a match, which is in line with recent literature followed by the forwards, the full-backs, and the wide midfielders.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In our study, significant differences in cinematic EL indicators between playing positions during the first half time of an OM were detected. Several previous studies have found differences in EL as distance, speed, and accelerations [38][39][40] between playing positions during both training and competition including both elite and amateur soccer players [26]. Moreover, considering physiological characteristics (i.e., HR and derived indices) [41,42] similar results have been found.…”
Background: Wearable inertial sensors are poorly used in soccer to monitor external load (EL) indicators. However, these devices could be useful for improving sports performance and potentially reducing the risk of injury. The aim of this study was to investigate the EL indicators (i.e., cinematic, mechanical, and metabolic) differences between playing positions (i.e., central backs, external strikers, fullbacks, midfielders, and wide midfielder) during the first half time of four official matches (OMs). Methods: 13 young professional soccer players (Under-19; age: 18.5 ± 0.4 years; height: 177 ± 6 cm; weight: 67 ± 4.8 kg) were monitored through a wearable inertial sensor (TalentPlayers TPDev, firmware version 1.3) during the season 2021–2022. Participants’ EL indicators were recorded during the first half time of four OMs. Results: significant differences were detected in all the EL indicators between playing positions except for two of them (i.e., distance traveled in the various metabolic power zones (<10 w) and the number of direction changes to the right >30° and with speed >2 m). Pairwise comparisons showed differences in EL indicators between playing positions. Conclusions: Young professional soccer players showed different loads and performances during OMs in relation to playing positions. Coaches should consider the different physical demands related to playing positions in order to design the most appropriate training program.
“…However, match running can be influenced by seasonal variations that need to be quantified in order to model individual and collective performance [5,6]. Several studies were published demonstrating the measurement of the match load in regional [7,8], national [4,9,10], and international competitions [11,12], reporting specific seasonal variation in match running for each competition. However, only three studies were carried out in Portuguese professional, semi-professional, and amateur football leagues [7,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies were published demonstrating the measurement of the match load in regional [7,8], national [4,9,10], and international competitions [11,12], reporting specific seasonal variation in match running for each competition. However, only three studies were carried out in Portuguese professional, semi-professional, and amateur football leagues [7,9,10]. It is therefore important to study the Portuguese league, which is in the top 10 best European leagues and recurrently in the UEFA top-five ranking [13].…”
The aim of this study was two-fold: (1) to analyze the influence of season phase (i.e., the start of the in-season and mid-in-season) on match running performance in a Portuguese professional football team; (2) to determine and model the main factor influencing match running performance during the in-season in this specific football team. Eighteen matches were collected by an 18 Hz global positioning system (GPS) from a professional Portuguese football team during the start of the in-season and mid-in-season. The match running performance was analyzed according to season phases, presenting significant differences in total distance (TD) (tlowerbound = 4.71, p < 0.001; tupperbound = −2.22, p = 0.002), average speed (AvS) (tlowerbound = 359.45, p < 0.001; tupperbound = −359.87, p < 0.001), and relative high speed running (rHSR) (tlowerbound = 13.10, p < 0.001; tupperbound = −10.21, p < 0.001). The logistic regression showed TD (β = −1.59, z = −2.84, p = 0.005) and AvS (β = 2.68, z = −2.84, p = 0.007) as the major factors influencing match running performance during seasonal variation. Sprints and accelerations showed no significance for predicting match running performance during the season phases (β = −0.05 to 1.07, z = −0.95 to 1.07, p = 0.29 to 0.72). Current research confirms that lower and upper bounds should be used to quantify seasonal differences on match running performance. TD and AvS were described as the main factors influencing match running performance during the in-season phase. Thus, it is important to highlight the pace and volume of the game to maximize match running performance.
“…For instance, one study was a systematic review that summarized studies about external and internal training load monitoring to provide range values for the main measures in young male soccer players [ 13 ]. Another study compared the external load between official and friendly matches and between the first and second halves of professional soccer players [ 14 ], while another analyzed differences among playing positions: whether playing home/away matches and if playing in the first or second part of the championship influence the external load of amateur soccer [ 15 ]. Moreover, external load was compared between starters and non-starters [ 16 ] and among the playing positions [ 17 ] of professional soccer players based on different parts of a full season.…”
Load monitoring consists of training/match demand quantification as well as wellness and readiness to maximize the likelihood of optimal athletic performance [...]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.