2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02757
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External Human–Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication: A Review of Empirical Work

Abstract: Interaction between drivers and pedestrians is often facilitated by informal communicative cues, like hand gestures, facial expressions, and eye contact. In the near future, however, when semi-and fully autonomous vehicles are introduced into the traffic system, drivers will gradually assume the role of mere passengers, who are casually engaged in non-driving-related activities and, therefore, unavailable to participate in traffic interaction. In this novel traffic environment, advanced communication interface… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(49 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As also stated in the review by Rouchitas et al [29], these results cannot be determined in real field tests with the Wizard of Oz approach. Here the critical gap is measured via button presses, which is the gap below the subjects will not begin to cross the road [13]- [16].…”
Section: B Decision Times Of Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As also stated in the review by Rouchitas et al [29], these results cannot be determined in real field tests with the Wizard of Oz approach. Here the critical gap is measured via button presses, which is the gap below the subjects will not begin to cross the road [13]- [16].…”
Section: B Decision Times Of Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Rouchitsas et al [29] published a detailed summary of empirical studies regarding automated vehicular communication interfaces and concluded that participants clearly benefit from additional communication interfaces. This is especially true in virtual reality studies in which the decision-making of crossings in front of AVs is facilitated, and the perceived safety is higher when additional information is shown.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the e-HMI background color was green or red. I previous research, it was found that color convention helped pedestrians understand the FAV intention; that is, a green e-HMI indicated it was s safe to cross, and the red implies that it was unsafe to cross ( Rouchitsas and Alm, 2019 ; Bazilinskyy et al, 2020 ). Besides, baseline images without the e-HMI were created, with a variation of car size and crossing distance (for the content of the entire images, see Supplementary Appendix 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardized methods already exist for other research areas of traffic psychology, e.g., for the evaluation of the in-vehicle HMIs of vehicles with automated driving systems [31] or to measure the eyes-off-road time as an indicator of distraction potential when interacting with in-vehicle information systems [32,33]. In their review article on the current state of research on eHMIs, Rouchitsas and Alm [34] declared that the "standardization of relevant procedures is a fundamental requirement for effective interface evaluations and meaningful comparisons. Therefore, future conceptual and empirical work in the field should primarily be concerned with producing standardized procedures for evaluating and comparing different implementations"(p. 10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%