2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-019-03306-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External fixators: looking beyond the hardware maze

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To manage scars induced by external fixation, adequate undermining of the soft tissues and volume replacement are needed. It is important to perform enough subcisions of the adhesions and fibrotic tissues under the scar because scars resulting from the percutaneous placement of transosseous pins or wires are hard to release [1,3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To manage scars induced by external fixation, adequate undermining of the soft tissues and volume replacement are needed. It is important to perform enough subcisions of the adhesions and fibrotic tissues under the scar because scars resulting from the percutaneous placement of transosseous pins or wires are hard to release [1,3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying external fixators or distractors is a common method used to manage complex fractures [1]. Although good alignment and bony union are important, prolonged pin placement may cause epidermal ingrowth and tethering of soft tissues to the underlying bone [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various types of external fixators were developed for specific types of fractures, including planar, circular and hybrid external fixators [ 12 ]. These different external fixators, designed with different stiffness and stability characteristics, can be classified according to their frame configurations as unilateral, bilateral, quadrilateral, triangular, semi-circular, and circular [ 13 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale behind this strategy, as opposed to repeat internal fixation, is to prevent bacterial colonization around new internal implants which could otherwise continue to hinder bony union. However, external fixation has its own drawbacks including patient discomfort over prolonged treatment courses, difficulty walking and maneuvering, and pin site infections 9 . In an effort to avoid external fixation, staged sterilization of the intramedullary (IM) canal was introduced using an antibiotic loaded, cement coated wire to control infection followed by definitive, locked IM nailing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%