2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2007.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External Fixators as an Adjunct to Wound Healing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Current advances in wound research have led to solutions that have markedly improved patient care. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Experimental observations have helped formulate guidelines of care providing the basis for uniform care across the United States. [9][10][11][12][13] Strengthening of wound healing research, in light of the rapidly growing threat, deserves a higher level of prioritization.…”
Section: Chronic Woundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Current advances in wound research have led to solutions that have markedly improved patient care. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Experimental observations have helped formulate guidelines of care providing the basis for uniform care across the United States. [9][10][11][12][13] Strengthening of wound healing research, in light of the rapidly growing threat, deserves a higher level of prioritization.…”
Section: Chronic Woundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the post-operative follow-up, there were 6 complications (50%) (4 pin site infections) and 2 rescue treatment failures, which required a major amputation (13%). 45 Dalla Paola et al reported, in a prospective study, the results using a circular external fixator (Fig. 4) designed for offloading of hindfoot lesions complicated by osteomyelitis, in a cohort of 18 diabetic patients in their unit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial search identified 53 eligible studies. 4-56 After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 28 studies were excluded. Nine studies were excluded because they were performed on foot wounds in patients without diabetes mellitus *.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%