2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External dose rate in Unirea salt mine, Slanic-Prahova, Romania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurements on the samples were made in our institute's underground laboratory at Slȃnic-Prahova; see figure 1. The laboratory was constructed and put into operation in 2006 [3]. The equivalent depth of the Unirea mine has been estimated from cosmic ray muon measurements to be 610 mwe (metres of water equivalent) [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements on the samples were made in our institute's underground laboratory at Slȃnic-Prahova; see figure 1. The laboratory was constructed and put into operation in 2006 [3]. The equivalent depth of the Unirea mine has been estimated from cosmic ray muon measurements to be 610 mwe (metres of water equivalent) [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt established an underground laboratory for dosimetry and spectrometry at the Asse salt mine, near Braunschweig, where a coaxial low-background HPGe detector with extended shielding was exploited [ 23 ]. A detailed investigation of the dose rate within the underground low-level background laboratories at the Unirea salt mine (Slanic-Prahova) has shown a relatively uniform distribution varying between 1.3 ± 0.3 nSv h outside the Low-Level Background Laboratory (LLBL) and 1.6 ± 0.3 nSv h inside it [ 24 , 25 ]. This measurement was performed by means of a calibrated scintillator rate meter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements have been performed around the water shielding for the DEAP-3600 experiment [ 5 , 20 ]. As can be seen from the report on natural gamma-ray backgrounds in the underground LLBL ([ 22 , 25 ] or [ 23 ]), the rate could be quite uniform and stable all over the lab, or it could vary (see, for example, [ 26 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the second detector, the shielding was the same excepting the inner OFHC Cu of which thickness was increased to 5 cm. In this way, the radiation shielding factor was about 3600-4000 for both instruments [9][10][11][12][13] (Margineanu et al, 2008,2009, Tudor et al, 2019 The two high resolution gamma spectrometers have been e ciency calibrated using IAEA certi ed reference sources of 241 Am, 137 Cs and 60 Co and by participating in pro ciency tests organized by the IAEA (2014-2021), as well as by using the CANBERRA GENIE200 GeometryComposer routine. Under these conditions, the total experimental uncertainty concerning the 137Cs inventory was no greater than 5%.…”
Section: Radiometric Determination and Statistical Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%