2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External costs of fossil electricity generation: Health-based assessment in Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Energies 2017, 10, 2136 11 of 28 without thresholds to very low increments in air pollution may lead to an overestimation of effects, which must be remembered when using the results of such studies [3,13,28,29,44]. Since most of the developing countries have no WTP studies, SIMPACTS offers the possibility of transferring the values assessed for European Union.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Energies 2017, 10, 2136 11 of 28 without thresholds to very low increments in air pollution may lead to an overestimation of effects, which must be remembered when using the results of such studies [3,13,28,29,44]. Since most of the developing countries have no WTP studies, SIMPACTS offers the possibility of transferring the values assessed for European Union.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Thai and Syrian studies have estimated that sulfates accounted up to 83% and 88% of the total damage costs, respectively, with the costs from nitrates being 9% and 10%, and the costs from PM 10 being 8% and 2%, respectively. In these studies, Thai power plants consume natural gas, lignite, and oil, while Syrian plants use heavy fuel oil and natural gas [13,16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations