External-Cost Estimation of Electricity Generation in G20 Countries: Case Study Using a Global Life-Cycle Impact-Assessment Method

Abstract

The external costs derived from the environmental impacts of electricity generation can be significant and should not be underrated, as their consideration can be useful to establish a ranking between different electricity generation sources to inform decision-makers. The aim of this research is to transparently evaluate the recent external cost of electricity generation in G20 countries using a global life-cycle impact-assessment (LCIA) method: life cycle impact assessment method based on endpoint modeling (LIME3). The weighting factors developed in the LIME3 method for each G20 country enable one to convert the different environmental impacts (not only climate change and air pollution) resulting from the emissions and resources consumption during the full lifecycle of electricity generation—from resource extraction to electricity generation—into a monetary value. Moreover, in LIME3, not only the weighting factors are developed for each G20 country but also all the impact categories. Using this method, it was possible to determine accurately which resources or emission had an environmental impact in each country. This study shows that the countries relying heavily on coal, such as India (0.172 $/kWh) or Indonesia (0.135 $/kWh) have the highest external costs inside the G20, with air pollution and climate accounting together for more than 80% of the costs. In these two countries, the ratio of the external cost/market price was the highest in the G20, at 2.3 and 1.7, respectively. On the other hand, countries with a higher reliance on renewable energies, such as Canada (0.008 $/kWh) or Brazil (0.012 $/kWh) have lower induced costs. When comparing with the market price, it has to be noted also that for instance Canada is able to generate cheap electricity with a low-external cost. For most of the other G20 countries, this cost was estimated at between about 0.020$ and 0.040 $/kWh. By estimating the external cost of each electricity generation technology available in each G20 country, this study also highlighted that sometimes the external cost of the electricity generated from one specific technology can be significant even when using renewables due to resource scarcity—for example, the 0.068 $/kWh of electricity generated from hydropower in India. This information, missing from most previous studies, should not be omitted by decision makers when considering which type of electricity generation source to prioritize.

Externalities of power generation in Visegrad countries and their integration through support of renewables

“…The evaluation of externality involves a requirement for substantial expertise. In energy sector, a life cycle approach must be applied for quantifying external costs of power generation (Karkour et al, 2020). There are many receptors that may be affected by power generation of various options including life cycle external costs of fuel chains.…”

Status of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Africa

“…As highlighted by Bjorn et al (2013) [7], little has been done concerning life cycle assessment (LCA) in Africa, where networks/research groups are notably limited. LCA is a useful technique to assess the environmental impacts of a product or service throughout its entire life cycle, i.e., from the extraction of raw material through to processing, transport, use, and finally recycling/disposal [8]. By considering several different impacts over the entire life cycle, it is possible to identify potential tradeoffs from transitioning one stage…”

Evolution of External Health Costs of Electricity Generation in the Baltic States

“…The recent study [48] applied the Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) method based on endpoint modelling (LIME3) for G20 countries. The monetary health estimates of pollutants endpoints were performed based on performed Willingness to Pay assessments in G20 countries [49].…”