External cervical resorption: part 2 – management

Patel, Shanon; Foschi, Federico; Condon, Robert E.; Pimentel, T.; Bhuva, Bhavin

doi:10.1111/iej.12946

Cited by 75 publications

(108 citation statements)

References 75 publications

(144 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Predisposing factors associated with external cervical root resorption induced by bleaching include history of trauma or orthodontic treatment both of which can cause inflammatory changes in the periodontium (Patel et al . ,). Another important factor is the application of heat during bleaching which increases diffusion of the bleaching agent (Friedman , Attin et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sodium percarbonate as a novel intracoronal bleaching agent: assessment of the associated risk of cervical root resorption

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To evaluate the extraradicular peroxide release from sodium percarbonate compared to sodium perborate as an intracoronal bleaching agent. Methodology Sixty mandibular single‐rooted premolars with intact CEJ were selected. After root filling, gutta‐percha was removed 4 mm apical to CEJ and 2 mm of GIC was condensed over the root filling. Intracoronal bleaching agents were placed into six groups of teeth (n = 10): sodium perborate with distilled water (SPW); sodium percarbonate with distilled water (SPCW); sodium perborate with 30% hydrogen peroxide (SPHP); sodium percarbonate with 30% hydrogen peroxide (SPCHP); 30% hydrogen peroxide as positive control (HP) and distilled water as negative control (CL). The teeth were then mounted in vials filled with distilled water, kept in an incubator and taken out at 1, 3 and 6 days for spectrophotometric analysis. Extraradicular peroxide release was quantified by the ferrothiocyanate method. Statistical analysis was undertaken with one‐way anova and Scheffe post hoc tests. Results The greatest peroxide release occurred in the HP group, followed by the SPCHP and SPHP groups, and then by the SPCW and SPW groups. Intergroup comparison revealed that there was no significant difference in peroxide release among the groups SPCW and SPW on days 1, 3 and 6 (P > 0.05). Similarly, no significant difference was found between the SPCHP and SPHP treated groups on days 1, 3 and 6 (P > 0.05). Conclusion Extraradicular peroxide release from sodium percarbonate was comparable to that of sodium perborate, as the differences were not significant.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sodium percarbonate as a novel intracoronal bleaching agent: assessment of the associated risk of cervical root resorption

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, more research is required to confirm the cause and effect relationship of these suggested aetiological factors (Patel et al . ).…”

Section: Aetiologymentioning

confidence: 97%

“…The presenting features of ECR are highly variable and dependent on several factors including location and degree of progression (Patel et al . ). It commonly presents as an incidental finding on clinical and radiographic examination, though there may be clinical signs of localized gingival inflammation and bleeding, pulpal involvement, or in more advanced cases apical periodontitis (Bergmans et al .…”

Section: Clinical Presentationmentioning

confidence: 97%

European Society of Endodontology position statement: External Cervical Resorption

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This Position Statement represents the consensus of an expert committee convened by the European Society of Endodontology (ESE) on External Cervical Resorption (ECR). The statement is based on current clinical and scientific evidence as well as the expertise of the committee. The primary aim is to provide a current authoritative position on the aetiology, histopathology, clinical presentation and management of ECR, and also to highlight areas where there is minimal evidence. Previously published review articles provide more detailed background information and the basis for this position statement (International Endodontic Journal 51, 1205, 2018, International Endodontic Journal 51, 1224, 2018). It is intended that this position statement will be updated at appropriate intervals, as further evidence emerges.

show abstract

“…, Patel et al . 2018a). In addition, the true nature of ECR (fibrovascular and bone‐like tissue) will also be more clearly discernible with CBCT (Gunst et al .…”

Section: Root Resorptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics – a review of the literature

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the diagnosis and/or management of endodontic problems is increasing and is reflected in the exponential rise in publications on this topic in the last two decades. The aim of this paper is to: (i) Review current literature on the endodontic applications of CBCT; (ii) Based on current evidence make recommendations for the use of CBCT in Endodontics; (iii) Highlight the areas in which more research is required.

show abstract

External cervical resorption: part 2 – management

Cited by 75 publications

References 75 publications

Sodium percarbonate as a novel intracoronal bleaching agent: assessment of the associated risk of cervical root resorption

Sodium percarbonate as a novel intracoronal bleaching agent: assessment of the associated risk of cervical root resorption

European Society of Endodontology position statement: External Cervical Resorption

Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics – a review of the literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About