2000
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.17.001846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exterior caustics produced in scattering of a diagonally incident plane wave by a circular cylinder: semiclassical scattering theory analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1(c), the electric-field peak emerges from the shadow-side surface of the cylinder as a strong jet-like distribution having a length of ~900 nm (1.8 λ 2 ) and a weakly subdiffraction FWHM intensity waist of ~200 nm (0.4 λ 2 ). The emergence of this jet from the shadow-side surface of the cylinder for n 1 ~ 2 is consistent with previous work on optical caustics 22, 23…”
Section: Initial Identification Of the Photonic Nanojet For A Diesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…1(c), the electric-field peak emerges from the shadow-side surface of the cylinder as a strong jet-like distribution having a length of ~900 nm (1.8 λ 2 ) and a weakly subdiffraction FWHM intensity waist of ~200 nm (0.4 λ 2 ). The emergence of this jet from the shadow-side surface of the cylinder for n 1 ~ 2 is consistent with previous work on optical caustics 22, 23…”
Section: Initial Identification Of the Photonic Nanojet For A Diesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[16][17][18][19] However, no further investigation has been reported to authenticate this hypothesis. In this study, the enhancement factor of Raman signals, in the order as high as 10 4 , was realized using closely packed silica spherical microparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The theoretical m ϭ 0 Fourier coefficient contains the 1.58% and 1.47% near-zone correction of Ref. 19 for the experimental r͞a ratios for the two rods and differs from the experimental m ϭ 0 coefficient by 35.6% and 5.7%, respectively. We do not know the reason for the large difference between the m ϭ 0 coefficients for the 8.05-mm rod.…”
Section: P ϭ 2 Supernumeraries Of the 244-mm-radius Glass Rodmentioning
confidence: 70%