1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00395134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extent of the mouse t complex and its inversions shown by in situ hybridization

Abstract: Probes for loci situated near one end of the proximal (Tcp-1) and distal (Qa-2, 3) inversions of the mouse t complex have been hybridized to chromosomes of mice with and without t complexes and with morphologically distinguishable chromosome 17s. Both the probe for Tcp-1 and that for Qa-2, 3 hybridized to clearly different positions on t and non-t chromosomes, thus making visible the extent of the two inversions. The proximal inversion extends from roughly the junction of bands A1 and A2 to band A3, and the di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we find strong statistical support for identical marker order on the Mmc and Mmm genetic linkage maps. Although small inversions (Lyon et al 1988), CNVs (Cheung et al 2003;She et al 2008), and insertions/deletions (Akagi et al 2010) segregate among house mice, such small-scale structural changes are not expected to exert systematic effects on the number or distribution of recombination events in a genome. Intervals showing map length differences between our two crosses do not show higher levels of CNV compared with genomic regions with no map length differences (Supplemental Table 3).…”
Section: Detection Of Map Length Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we find strong statistical support for identical marker order on the Mmc and Mmm genetic linkage maps. Although small inversions (Lyon et al 1988), CNVs (Cheung et al 2003;She et al 2008), and insertions/deletions (Akagi et al 2010) segregate among house mice, such small-scale structural changes are not expected to exert systematic effects on the number or distribution of recombination events in a genome. Intervals showing map length differences between our two crosses do not show higher levels of CNV compared with genomic regions with no map length differences (Supplemental Table 3).…”
Section: Detection Of Map Length Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical cytogenetic investigations failed to detect these inversions (38,39) and have been generally unsuccessful in discovering rearrangements among species of Mus (40). However, inversions have been visualized by comparative in situ hybridizations with probes for loci within the proximal and distal inversions (41). With the advent of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, it should now be possible to survey populations for the presence of the proximal inversion, as well as the other inversions, without the need for genetic crosses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The t complex is the name given to the rearranged region. It contains about 100 genes (39), including several genes expressed in the testes whose products show t-allele-specific alterations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%