2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extent of nucleus pulposus migration in the annulus of porcine intervertebral discs exposed to cyclic flexion only versus cyclic flexion and extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compressive strain on the anterior side of the discs (Figure , cycles 10 005 and 20 000) in the most neutral position image relative to cycle 5 is indicative of wedging of the discs, implying that the anatomical neutral position of the motion segment changes as the number of cycles increases . This modified anatomical neutral state deforms the nucleus pulposus posteriorly relative to the first cycle of loading, and is consistent with existing literature reports that showed similar deformation at 10 000 or fewer cycles . This deformation alters the center of rotation between the adjacent two vertebrae and also increases lumbar disc herniation risk, and may explain the observed changes in intervertebral kinematics (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compressive strain on the anterior side of the discs (Figure , cycles 10 005 and 20 000) in the most neutral position image relative to cycle 5 is indicative of wedging of the discs, implying that the anatomical neutral position of the motion segment changes as the number of cycles increases . This modified anatomical neutral state deforms the nucleus pulposus posteriorly relative to the first cycle of loading, and is consistent with existing literature reports that showed similar deformation at 10 000 or fewer cycles . This deformation alters the center of rotation between the adjacent two vertebrae and also increases lumbar disc herniation risk, and may explain the observed changes in intervertebral kinematics (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…22,23 This modified anatomical neutral state deforms 24 the nucleus pulposus posteriorly relative to the first cycle of loading, and is consistent with existing literature reports that showed similar deformation at 10 000 or fewer cycles. 25,26 This deformation alters the center of rotation between the adjacent two vertebrae and also increases lumbar disc herniation risk, and may Intervertebral Angles FIGURE 5 Intervertebral angles for a representative cervine specimen. Note the change in inflection of the later cycles compared to the earlier cycles explain the observed changes in intervertebral kinematics ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 12 14 15 The results agree with findings from Tanaka and colleagues, 13 who found evidence of cartilaginous end plate separation in degenerated cadaveric specimens. Intervertebral disk herniation can occur under both acute 16 17 and repetitive 18 19 20 21 flexion and extension motions with varying degrees of compressive load. Unlike the annulus and nucleus tissues, the hyaline cartilage does not swell greatly in tissue fluid, even when physically disrupted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] The inelastic behaviour that assures a more even distribution of local stresses is a fundamental characteristic of the healthy IVD provided by its two main subcomponents, that is, inner nucleus pulposus (NP) and outer annulus fibrosus (AF). The respective role of NP and AF during motion of the functional spine unit (FSU) has to be understood through their interactions and their specificities, for example, NP migration [18][19][20][21] and AF micro-structure. 16,22,23 Cyclically loaded FSUs exhibit a hysteretic response manifested by a difference between loading and unloading paths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%