2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-015-1517-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extent of genotypic variation for maize cell wall bioconversion traits across environments and among hybrid combinations

Abstract: The utilization of maize stover as a substrate for bioenergy production demands the development of dual-purpose hybrid varieties combining both, optimal grain yield and improved biomass processing amenability. In this study, our objectives were to assess how contrasting environments influence the expression of cell wall composition and bioconversion traits relevant to cellulosic fuel production, and to study how these traits are inherited in hybrid combinations. To this end, a panel of maize double haploid (DH… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dealing with large genotype-by-environment interaction in breeding programs usually means that germplasm has to be trialed in multiple locations as selection based upon data from a single experiment might lead to wrong selection decisions. However, like for several forage crops such as silage maize (Dolstra et al, 1992; Cox et al, 1994; Argillier et al, 1997; Barrière et al, 2008; Torres et al, 2015), alfalfa (Sheaffer et al, 1998) and switchgrass (Hopkins et al, 1995), the variation attributed to the genotype-by-environment interaction effect is considerably smaller than the variation attributed to the genotype and environment main effects (Tables 4, 5). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dealing with large genotype-by-environment interaction in breeding programs usually means that germplasm has to be trialed in multiple locations as selection based upon data from a single experiment might lead to wrong selection decisions. However, like for several forage crops such as silage maize (Dolstra et al, 1992; Cox et al, 1994; Argillier et al, 1997; Barrière et al, 2008; Torres et al, 2015), alfalfa (Sheaffer et al, 1998) and switchgrass (Hopkins et al, 1995), the variation attributed to the genotype-by-environment interaction effect is considerably smaller than the variation attributed to the genotype and environment main effects (Tables 4, 5). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cellular morphology of plant organs is largely investigated in relation to other physical properties such as shape, size, growth, mechanical properties or chemical composition. In particular, crop species like maize (Zea mays L.) are of increasing interest for cattle feeding or for production of bioethanol and biomolecules [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Several mechanical, biochemical and/or enzymatic processes are involved to transform the raw material, mainly composed of the stem and the leaf cell walls, into energy or fuel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%