2016
DOI: 10.3171/2015.4.jns1528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive traumatic anterior skull base fractures with cerebrospinal fluid leak: classification and repair techniques using combined vascularized tissue flaps

Abstract: OBJECT This article introduces a classification scheme for extensive traumatic anterior skull base fracture to help stratify surgical treatment options. The authors describe their multilayer repair technique for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak resulting from extensive anterior skull base fracture using a combination of laterally pediculated temporalis fascial-pericranial, nasoseptal-pericranial, and anterior pericranial flaps. METHODS Retrospective chart review identified patients treated surgically between Ja… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
61
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
61
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients with posterior table fractures in the current series had CSF leakage. Although the pericranial flap is the workhorse of open anterior skull base reconstruction, it has a 10% to 17% failure rate in the management of traumatic leaks, most likely due to poor visualization at the ethmoid roof. Importantly, 31 (73.8%) subjects with posterior table fractures in this study also had involvement of the anterior skull base (ethmoid roof and cribriform).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients with posterior table fractures in the current series had CSF leakage. Although the pericranial flap is the workhorse of open anterior skull base reconstruction, it has a 10% to 17% failure rate in the management of traumatic leaks, most likely due to poor visualization at the ethmoid roof. Importantly, 31 (73.8%) subjects with posterior table fractures in this study also had involvement of the anterior skull base (ethmoid roof and cribriform).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] Central defects or type I defects can easily be repaired by transnasal endoscopic approach, but lateral defects (II), both central and lateral (III) including frontal sinus defects and middle skull base defects (IV), can only be repaired by an open approach. [1][2][3]9,[11][12][13][14]19,[21][22][23] In this study, a strong relation between the location and the surgical approach was achieved, which denies the fact stated by Manuel et al 20 that location is not a predisposing factor for a surgical approach. Also in this study, no other endoscopic approach apart from transnasal endoscopic approach was done.…”
Section: Identification Of Factorsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Simple skull base defect with CSF leak can be repaired by transnasal endoscopic approach, but compound, depressed, comminuted, and complex type of defect are to be repaired through an open craniotomy approach. [1][2][3][10][11][12][13][14][15] In compound, comminuted, depressed, and complex or mixed type of defect, the realignment, removal, and or fixation of fracture is not possible through an endoscope; therefore, in such cases, open craniotomy is mandatory. Also in this study, the comminuted fractures with very small floating bone fragments were removed, and if the defect is large then trimmed, titanium mesh was used, else titanium plates were used to fix the free bone fragments.…”
Section: Identification Of Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Dual and triple flap techniques that combine various anterior, lateral, and nasoseptal flaps can also be used in extensive and severe cases. 12 Recent studies aimed at understanding CSF leaks originating at the skull base have focused on risks for recurrence postoperatively. Size of dural defect and location of surgery have been found to be important risk factors for CSF leak in skull-base reconstruction using nasoseptal flaps, with dural defects larger than 2.0 cm 2 and surgery to the sella or clivus posing a greater risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%