Abstract:Affinity maturation is a powerful technique in antibody engineering for the in vitro evolution of antigen binding interactions. Key to the success of this process is the expansion of sequence and combinatorial diversity to increase the structural repertoire from which superior binding variants may be selected. However, conventional strategies are often restrictive and only focus on small regions of the antibody at a time. In this study, we used a method that combined antibody chain shuffling and a stag… Show more
“…The structural and epitope interaction rationale behind the antibody sequence evolution seen during the affinity maturation process is described and discussed in detail in a related paper. 25 The ARG2 binding affinity of 173 pM for C0021158 equates to an approximately 50-fold improvement in affinity relative to the Representative data further characterizing clones C0020185 (Δ), C0020186 (▲) and C0020187 (□) originally identified in the parallel in vitro ARG2 biochemical and inhibition high throughput screens. Each clone binds (a) recombinant biotinylated trimeric human ARG2, but not (b) recombinant biotinylated trimeric human ARG1 and (c) effectively neutralizes recombinant trimeric human ARG2 in a scFv concentration-dependent manner.…”
Section: Discovery and Affinity Optimization Of Arg2 Inhibitory Antibmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This was later confirmed by comparison of crystal structures solved for the parent (C0020187) and selected affinity matured (C001158 and C001181) inhibitory antibodies bound to ARG2. 25 In addition, no amino acid changes were seen in either V L CDR1 or V H CDR3, which suggests that Figure 1. High throughput screening of ARG2 phage display round two outputs identified large numbers of human ARG2-specific binders, but few ARG2 inhibitors.…”
Section: Discovery and Affinity Optimization Of Arg2 Inhibitory Antibmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…No binding of C0021158 to human ARG1 was detected using bio-layer interferometry. 25 Commensurate with an increase in affinity, C0021158 displayed significant improvements in in vitro potency, fully inhibiting recombinant human ARG2, with an IC 50 of 18.5 ± 5.1 nM as an IgG ( Figure 5). There is also a significant change in the steepness of the inhibitory profile seen for C0021158 compared to its parent C0020187 ( Figure 5), with C0020187 appearing to show negative cooperativity in inhibition, implying three non-equivalent binding sites on the ARG2 trimer.…”
Section: Discovery and Affinity Optimization Of Arg2 Inhibitory Antibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C0020187 was affinity optimized using a comprehensive affinity maturation campaign that targeted, in a nonbiased manner, the parental scFv's entire sequence, as described in detail by Chan et al 25 The main thrust of this work sought to exploit and recombine advantageous mutations across all six of C0020187's hypervariable complementarity-determining regions (CDRs). Importantly, lead optimized scFvs continued to be screened for ARG2 specificity and inhibition at each stage of the affinity optimization process, helping to ensure that C0020187's inhibitory epitope was retained.…”
Section: Discovery and Affinity Optimization Of Arg2 Inhibitory Antibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ScFv clones were reformatted to human IgG1 and the corresponding Fab fragment to enable functional screening in a T-cell proliferation assay and to determine antibody affinity using bio-layer interferometry, respectively. Using this approach, several significantly more tightly binding antibodies were identified, including C0021158, C0021181, C0021177, and C0021144 (K D values of 173 pM, 288 pM, 173 pM and 338 pM, respectively 25 ). The lead antibody C0021158 differs from the parent antibody C0020187 by 1 residue in V H FW1 (Kabat residues: S30R), 5 residues in V H CDR1 (Kabat residues: S31Y; Y32E; A33V; M34A; and S35A), 5 in V H CDR2 (Kabat residues: S53P; G54I; G55P; S56K; T57G), 2 in V L CDR2 (Kabat residues: P55T, S56A), 1 residue in V L FW3 (Kabat residue: I58V) and 4 in V L CDR3 (Kabat residues: S93E, S94L, L95T, A95bN) ( Figure 4).…”
Section: Discovery and Affinity Optimization Of Arg2 Inhibitory Antibmentioning
Arginase 2 (ARG2) is a binuclear manganese metalloenzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of L-arginine. The dysregulated expression of ARG2 within specific tumor microenvironments generates an immunosuppressive niche that effectively renders the tumor 'invisible' to the host's immune system. Increased ARG2 expression leads to a concomitant depletion of local L-arginine levels, which in turn leads to suppression of anti-tumor T-cell-mediated immune responses. Here we describe the isolation and characterization of a high affinity antibody (C0021158) that inhibits ARG2 enzymatic function completely, effectively restoring T-cell proliferation in vitro. Enzyme kinetic studies confirmed that C0021158 exhibits a noncompetitive mechanism of action, inhibiting ARG2 independently of L-arginine concentrations. To elucidate C0021158's inhibitory mechanism at a structural level, the co-crystal structure of the Fab in complex with trimeric ARG2 was solved. C0021158's epitope was consequently mapped to an area some distance from the enzyme's substrate binding cleft, indicating an allosteric mechanism was being employed. Following C0021158 binding, distinct regions of ARG2 undergo major conformational changes. Notably, the backbone structure of a surface-exposed loop is completely rearranged, leading to the formation of a new short helix structure at the Fab-ARG2 interface. Moreover, this large-scale structural remodeling at ARG2's epitope translates into more subtle changes within the enzyme's active site. An arginine residue at position 39 is reoriented inwards, sterically impeding the binding of L-arginine. Arg39 is also predicted to alter the pK A of a key catalytic histidine residue at position 160, further attenuating ARG2's enzymatic function. In silico molecular docking simulations predict that L-arginine is unable to bind effectively when antibody is bound, a prediction supported by isothermal calorimetry experiments using an L-arginine mimetic. Specifically, targeting ARG2 in the tumor microenvironment through the application of C0021158, potentially in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens or alternate immunotherapies, represents a potential new strategy to target immune cold tumors.
“…The structural and epitope interaction rationale behind the antibody sequence evolution seen during the affinity maturation process is described and discussed in detail in a related paper. 25 The ARG2 binding affinity of 173 pM for C0021158 equates to an approximately 50-fold improvement in affinity relative to the Representative data further characterizing clones C0020185 (Δ), C0020186 (▲) and C0020187 (□) originally identified in the parallel in vitro ARG2 biochemical and inhibition high throughput screens. Each clone binds (a) recombinant biotinylated trimeric human ARG2, but not (b) recombinant biotinylated trimeric human ARG1 and (c) effectively neutralizes recombinant trimeric human ARG2 in a scFv concentration-dependent manner.…”
Section: Discovery and Affinity Optimization Of Arg2 Inhibitory Antibmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This was later confirmed by comparison of crystal structures solved for the parent (C0020187) and selected affinity matured (C001158 and C001181) inhibitory antibodies bound to ARG2. 25 In addition, no amino acid changes were seen in either V L CDR1 or V H CDR3, which suggests that Figure 1. High throughput screening of ARG2 phage display round two outputs identified large numbers of human ARG2-specific binders, but few ARG2 inhibitors.…”
Section: Discovery and Affinity Optimization Of Arg2 Inhibitory Antibmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…No binding of C0021158 to human ARG1 was detected using bio-layer interferometry. 25 Commensurate with an increase in affinity, C0021158 displayed significant improvements in in vitro potency, fully inhibiting recombinant human ARG2, with an IC 50 of 18.5 ± 5.1 nM as an IgG ( Figure 5). There is also a significant change in the steepness of the inhibitory profile seen for C0021158 compared to its parent C0020187 ( Figure 5), with C0020187 appearing to show negative cooperativity in inhibition, implying three non-equivalent binding sites on the ARG2 trimer.…”
Section: Discovery and Affinity Optimization Of Arg2 Inhibitory Antibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C0020187 was affinity optimized using a comprehensive affinity maturation campaign that targeted, in a nonbiased manner, the parental scFv's entire sequence, as described in detail by Chan et al 25 The main thrust of this work sought to exploit and recombine advantageous mutations across all six of C0020187's hypervariable complementarity-determining regions (CDRs). Importantly, lead optimized scFvs continued to be screened for ARG2 specificity and inhibition at each stage of the affinity optimization process, helping to ensure that C0020187's inhibitory epitope was retained.…”
Section: Discovery and Affinity Optimization Of Arg2 Inhibitory Antibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ScFv clones were reformatted to human IgG1 and the corresponding Fab fragment to enable functional screening in a T-cell proliferation assay and to determine antibody affinity using bio-layer interferometry, respectively. Using this approach, several significantly more tightly binding antibodies were identified, including C0021158, C0021181, C0021177, and C0021144 (K D values of 173 pM, 288 pM, 173 pM and 338 pM, respectively 25 ). The lead antibody C0021158 differs from the parent antibody C0020187 by 1 residue in V H FW1 (Kabat residues: S30R), 5 residues in V H CDR1 (Kabat residues: S31Y; Y32E; A33V; M34A; and S35A), 5 in V H CDR2 (Kabat residues: S53P; G54I; G55P; S56K; T57G), 2 in V L CDR2 (Kabat residues: P55T, S56A), 1 residue in V L FW3 (Kabat residue: I58V) and 4 in V L CDR3 (Kabat residues: S93E, S94L, L95T, A95bN) ( Figure 4).…”
Section: Discovery and Affinity Optimization Of Arg2 Inhibitory Antibmentioning
Arginase 2 (ARG2) is a binuclear manganese metalloenzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of L-arginine. The dysregulated expression of ARG2 within specific tumor microenvironments generates an immunosuppressive niche that effectively renders the tumor 'invisible' to the host's immune system. Increased ARG2 expression leads to a concomitant depletion of local L-arginine levels, which in turn leads to suppression of anti-tumor T-cell-mediated immune responses. Here we describe the isolation and characterization of a high affinity antibody (C0021158) that inhibits ARG2 enzymatic function completely, effectively restoring T-cell proliferation in vitro. Enzyme kinetic studies confirmed that C0021158 exhibits a noncompetitive mechanism of action, inhibiting ARG2 independently of L-arginine concentrations. To elucidate C0021158's inhibitory mechanism at a structural level, the co-crystal structure of the Fab in complex with trimeric ARG2 was solved. C0021158's epitope was consequently mapped to an area some distance from the enzyme's substrate binding cleft, indicating an allosteric mechanism was being employed. Following C0021158 binding, distinct regions of ARG2 undergo major conformational changes. Notably, the backbone structure of a surface-exposed loop is completely rearranged, leading to the formation of a new short helix structure at the Fab-ARG2 interface. Moreover, this large-scale structural remodeling at ARG2's epitope translates into more subtle changes within the enzyme's active site. An arginine residue at position 39 is reoriented inwards, sterically impeding the binding of L-arginine. Arg39 is also predicted to alter the pK A of a key catalytic histidine residue at position 160, further attenuating ARG2's enzymatic function. In silico molecular docking simulations predict that L-arginine is unable to bind effectively when antibody is bound, a prediction supported by isothermal calorimetry experiments using an L-arginine mimetic. Specifically, targeting ARG2 in the tumor microenvironment through the application of C0021158, potentially in combination with standard chemotherapy regimens or alternate immunotherapies, represents a potential new strategy to target immune cold tumors.
Protein engineering through directed evolution is an effective way to obtain proteins with novel functions with the potential applications as tools for diagnosis or therapeutics. Many natural proteins have undergone directed evolution in vitro in the test tubes in the laboratories worldwide, resulting in the numerous protein variants with novel or enhanced functions. we constructed here an SH2 variant library by randomizing 8 variable residues in its phosphotyrosine (pTyr) binding pocket. Selection of this library by a pTyr peptide led to the identification of SH2 variants with enhanced affinities measured by EC50. Fluorescent polarization was then applied to quantify the binding affinities of the newly identified SH2 variants. As a result, three SH2 variants, named V3, V13 and V24, have comparable binding affinities with the previously identified SH2 triple‐mutant superbinder. Biolayer Interferometry assay was employed to disclose the kinetics of the binding of these SH2 superbinders to the phosphotyrosine peptide. The results indicated that all the SH2 superbinders have two‐orders increase of the dissociation rate when binding the pTyr peptide while there was no significant change in their associate rates. Intriguingly, though binding the pTyr peptide with comparable affinity with other SH2 superbinders, the V3 does not bind to the sTyr peptide. However, variant V13 and V24 have cross‐reactivity with both pTyr and sTyr peptides. The newly identified superbinders could be utilized as tools for the identification of pTyr‐containing proteins from tissues under different physiological or pathophysiological conditions and may have the potential in the therapeutics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.