2020
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive Recombination Suppression and Epistatic Selection Causes Chromosome-Wide Differentiation of a Selfish Sex Chromosome inDrosophila pseudoobscura

Abstract: Sex-Ratio (SR) chromosomes are selfish X-chromosomes that distort Mendelian segregation and are commonly associated with inversions. These chromosomal rearrangements suppress recombination with Standard (ST) X-chromosomes and are hypothesized to maintain multiple alleles important for drive in a single large haplotype. Here, we conduct a multifaceted study of the multiply inverted Drosophila pseudoobscura SR chromosome to understand the evolutionary history, genetic architecture, and present-day dynamics that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
(250 reference statements)
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, all markers within haploblock HB27a (in QTL-2 ) experienced segregation distortion in the yellow QTL mapping population. Segregation distortion is common in mapping studies, can be associated with chromosomal inversions (Fuller et al, 2020; X. Li, Wang, Wei, & Brummer, 2011), and is often caused by meiotic drive (Lyttle, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, all markers within haploblock HB27a (in QTL-2 ) experienced segregation distortion in the yellow QTL mapping population. Segregation distortion is common in mapping studies, can be associated with chromosomal inversions (Fuller et al, 2020; X. Li, Wang, Wei, & Brummer, 2011), and is often caused by meiotic drive (Lyttle, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inversions with a large effect on complex multitrait phenotypes, such as lifehistory, behaviour, and colour patterns, confirm that arrangements can behave as haplotypes of a "supergene", linking together combinations of alleles within each arrangement (Joron et al 2011;Schwander et al 2014;Kirubakaran et al 2016;Wellenreuther and Bernatchez 2018;Yan et al 2020). Inversions are also notable for their associations with segregation distorters, involving epistatic selection which favours linkage between coadapted alleles at interacting loci (Sturtevant and Dobzhansky 1936;Fuller et al 2020). Likewise, covariation between inversion frequencies and environmental variables, whether spatial, temporal or experimental, (Dobzhansky 1948;Schaeffer 2008;Kapun et al 2016;Kirubakaran et al 2016;Faria et al 2019;Kapun and Flatt 2019;Huang and Rieseberg 2020) is consistent with selection for the suppression of recombination between locally adaptive loci (Kirkpatrick and Barton 2006;Charlesworth and Barton 2018) and/or coadaptive epistatic interactions between loci (Dobzhansky and Dobzhansky 1970;Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1973).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inversions with a large effect on complex multitrait phenotypes, such as life-history, behavior, and color patterns, confirm that arrangements can behave as haplotypes of a “supergene,” linking together combinations of alleles within each arrangement ( Joron et al 2011 ; Schwander et al 2014 ; Kirubakaran et al 2016 ; Wellenreuther and Bernatchez 2018 ; Yan et al 2020 ). Inversions are also notable for their associations with segregation distorters, involving epistatic selection which favors linkage between coadapted alleles at interacting loci ( Sturtevant and Dobzhansky 1936 ; Fuller et al 2020 ). Likewise, covariation between inversion frequencies and environmental variables, whether spatial, temporal, or experimental ( Dobzhansky 1948 ; Schaeffer 2008 ; Kapun et al 2016 ; Kirubakaran et al 2016 ; Faria et al 2019 ; Kapun and Flatt 2019 ; Huang and Rieseberg 2020 ) is consistent with selection for the suppression of recombination between locally adaptive loci ( Kirkpatrick and Barton 2006 ; Charlesworth and Barton 2018 ) and/or coadaptive epistatic interactions between loci ( Dobzhansky and Dobzhansky 1970 ; Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1973 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%