2012
DOI: 10.3378/027.084.0603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive Population Structure in San, Khoe, and Mixed Ancestry Populations from Southern Africa Revealed by 44 Short 5-SNP Haplotypes

Abstract: to acquire final version. While analyses based on the genotypic SNP data only supported the division of the included populations into three main groups, Khoe-San, Bantu-speakers and nonAfrican populations, haplotype analyses revealed finer structure within Khoe-San populations. Through using only 44 short SNP haplotypes (compiled from a total of 220 SNPs), most of the Khoe-San groups could be resolved as separate groups by applying STRUCTURE analyses. Therefore, by carefully selecting a few SNPs and combining … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Excluding H22, the oldest lineages H19–H21 and H17 belong to Khoe-San from South-Africa and Namibia, consistent with Khoe-San representing the oldest of all extant populations [68]-[73]. Our results are in line with earlier evidence from uniparentally transmitted markers [24], [74][77] and from microsatellite data [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Excluding H22, the oldest lineages H19–H21 and H17 belong to Khoe-San from South-Africa and Namibia, consistent with Khoe-San representing the oldest of all extant populations [68]-[73]. Our results are in line with earlier evidence from uniparentally transmitted markers [24], [74][77] and from microsatellite data [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Visualization of these ancestries according to geographic sampling location specifically demonstrates fine-scale structure in and around the Kalahari Desert ( Figure 2). While prior studies have argued for a northern vs. southern divergence of KhoeSan populations (Pickrell et al 2012;Schlebusch and Soodyall 2012;Barbieri et al 2013Barbieri et al , 2014, the structure inferred from our data set indicates a more geographically complex pattern of divergence and gene flow. Even recent migration events into southern Africa remain structured, consistent with ecological boundaries to gene flow (see below).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…New genetic data indicate that there is deep population divergence even among KhoeSan groups (Pickrell et al 2012;Schlebusch et al , 2013Schlebusch and Soodyall 2012;Barbieri et al 2013), with populations living in the northern Kalahari estimated to have split from southern groups 30,000-35,000 years ago (Pickrell et al 2012;Schlebusch and Soodyall 2012). Pickrell et al (2012) estimate a time of divergence between the northwestern Kalahari and southeastern Kalahari population dating back to 30,000 years ago; "northwestern" refers to Juu-speaking groups like the !Xun and Ju|'hoansi, while "southeastern" refers to Taa speakers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most dominant contribution to the Afrikaner population came from European immigrants ( [9,30,31] and Additional file 1: Supplementary Text), whereas the Coloured population has more diverse ancestries [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. The colonization of southern Africa started in 1652 when the Dutch East India Company (DEIC) established a refreshment station at the Cape of Good Hope (Cape Town today).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%