2013
DOI: 10.1115/1.4024625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive Parametric Study of Heat Transfer to Arrays of Oblique Impinging Jets With Phase Change

Abstract: This work presents the single-and two-phase results of a parametric study investigating the performance of oblique jet arrays impinging at 45 deg on a 3.63 cm square copper heater surface using R-245fa. It was found that the parameters that most impact heat transfer changed as the system progressed from single-to two-phase flow behavior. The single-phase peiformance was governed by the jet geometry and the volumetric flow rate, while in the two-phase region, heat transfer performance was primarily affected by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This cubic relationship illustrates that the presence of the bubbles improves the effectiveness of the heat transfer, with higher vapour generation rates resulting in higher heat transfer coefficients. transfer mechanisms are associated with the local bubble activity and phase interactions opposed to convective influences, which is consistent with earlier convective boiling studies [16][17][18]. However, considering the boiling curves shown in Figure 9, there are some subtle differences between the different mass fluxes.…”
Section: Influence Of Heat Fluxsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This cubic relationship illustrates that the presence of the bubbles improves the effectiveness of the heat transfer, with higher vapour generation rates resulting in higher heat transfer coefficients. transfer mechanisms are associated with the local bubble activity and phase interactions opposed to convective influences, which is consistent with earlier convective boiling studies [16][17][18]. However, considering the boiling curves shown in Figure 9, there are some subtle differences between the different mass fluxes.…”
Section: Influence Of Heat Fluxsupporting
confidence: 89%