2002
DOI: 10.1162/089892902760807203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive Individual Differences in Brain Activations Associated with Episodic Retrieval are Reliable Over Time

Abstract: The localization of brain functions using neuroimaging techniques is commonly dependent on statistical analyses of groups of subjects in order to identify sites of activation, particularly in studies of episodic memory. Exclusive reliance on group analysis may be to the detriment of understanding the true underlying cognitive nature of brain activations. In the present study, we found that the patterns of brain activity associated with episodic retrieval are very distinct for individual subjects from the patte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
110
1
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
110
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of these networks involves different anatomical areas, and each has its own time course of development. Although the general anatomy of each network is relatively fixed, there are clearly individual anatomical variations (22) and behavioral differences in the efficiency of their operation (13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these networks involves different anatomical areas, and each has its own time course of development. Although the general anatomy of each network is relatively fixed, there are clearly individual anatomical variations (22) and behavioral differences in the efficiency of their operation (13).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas it is trivial to demonstrate prefrontal activation in working memory tasks, previous work has shown that there are frequently interindividual differences in the spatial location of activation (Miller et al, 2002;Wei et al, 2004). This could dilute observed effects in this region with multi-subject voxel-by-voxel analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, no matter how the brain is measured, it is obvious that the brain's natural state is inherently variable (see "Variance" in Fig. 1) (Arieli et al, 1996;Miller et al, 2002;Laskaris et al, 2003;Neumann et al, 2003;Huettel et al, 2004;Faisal et al, 2008;McIntosh et al, 2008). Current evidence suggests substantial intrasubject variability in the blood oxygen leveldependent (BOLD) signal within and across testing sessions, but BOLD signal variance is often discounted as merely reflecting issues with task, image acquisition and preprocessing, statistical power, reliability, or other nuisance effects (Aguirre et al, 1998;Miller et al, 2002;Neumann et al, 2003;Huettel et al, 2004;Smith et al, 2005;Andrews-Hanna et al, 2007;Jones et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%