2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-008-2950-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive characterization of the optical feedback cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy (OF-CEAS) technique: ringdown-time calibration of the absorption scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the volume of the gas cell can be drastically reduced using the Brewster window as a window of the gas cell. Exploiting optical feedback, light can be efficiently coupled into cavities of significantly higher finesse than presented herein, yielding even higher intracavity powers [38]. The resulting intracavity intensities exceed the saturation intensities of many molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the volume of the gas cell can be drastically reduced using the Brewster window as a window of the gas cell. Exploiting optical feedback, light can be efficiently coupled into cavities of significantly higher finesse than presented herein, yielding even higher intracavity powers [38]. The resulting intracavity intensities exceed the saturation intensities of many molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For the Brewster window cavity, rather than the transmission of the in-coupling mirror, the reflectivity R B of the Brewster window determines how much light is coupled into the cavity. R B and hence the power buildup can be adjusted conveniently by changing the angle at which the window is placed in the cavity, which is a unique feature of the Brewster cavity design [31,38]. The bidirectional power P intra circulating inside the cavity on resonance assuming perfect mode matching as a function of R B is given by (see Appendix A for derivation) Herein, P 0 is the incident laser power, R M is the mirror reflectivity (assumed equal for both mirrors) and αL are the combined half round-trip losses excluding reflective losses.…”
Section: Optical Impedance Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such OF-CRDS approaches have been used to measure absorption spectra (Morville et al , 2004;Motto-Ros et al , 2007;van Helden et al , 2009;Tan et al , 2010), aerosol-particle extinction (Butler et al , 2007(Butler et al , , 2009) and ultra-high refl ectivity (Gong et al , 2008). In addition to timedomain OF-CRDS measurements, its closely related amplitude-domain analogue, CEAS/ICOS (as in Section 6.4.1 ), has also been applied in the OF mode to absorption spectroscopy (Morville et al , 2005;Courtillot et al , 2006;Kerstel et al , 2006;Romanini et al , 2006;Motto-Ros et al , 2008;Wehr et al , 2008;Baran et al , 2009;van Helden et al , 2009;Ventrillard-Courtillot et al , 2009;Hamilton et al , 2010;Habig, et al , 2012). We note that analogous passive feedback between an AR-coated diode laser and a simple three-mirror V-shaped optical build-up cavity was demonstrated in early frequency-locking work by King and Pittaro (1998), providing an excitation source for measurements of spontaneous Raman spectra.…”
Section: Optical Feedback (Of) Crds and Ceas/icosmentioning
confidence: 98%