2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive and nonextensive statistics in seismic inversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we considered the incorrect source signatures depicted in Figure 3. Incorrect source I (dashed blue line in Figure 3) was a modified version of the Ricker wavelet, as suggested in [44]; its amplitude w 1 (t) was associated with Equation (15) through the following relationship: w 1 (t) = w(t)exp(5t). Incorrect source II (dotted red line in Figure 3) was constructed from the derivative of incorrect source I, w 2 (t) ∝ dw 1 (t) dt , and incorrect source III (solid green line in Figure 3) was a real-valued Morlet wavelet: w 3 (t) = exp(−t 2 /2)cos(5t).…”
Section: Sensitivity To the Source Signaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, we considered the incorrect source signatures depicted in Figure 3. Incorrect source I (dashed blue line in Figure 3) was a modified version of the Ricker wavelet, as suggested in [44]; its amplitude w 1 (t) was associated with Equation (15) through the following relationship: w 1 (t) = w(t)exp(5t). Incorrect source II (dotted red line in Figure 3) was constructed from the derivative of incorrect source I, w 2 (t) ∝ dw 1 (t) dt , and incorrect source III (solid green line in Figure 3) was a real-valued Morlet wavelet: w 3 (t) = exp(−t 2 /2)cos(5t).…”
Section: Sensitivity To the Source Signaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to mitigate the effect of non-Gaussian errors, several robust formulations have been proposed in the literature. Among them, we may mention the criteria based on heavytailed probability functions, such as Student's t and Cauchy-Lorentz distributions [8,9]; hybrid functions [10][11][12]; and generalized probability distributions, such as the deformed Gaussian distributions in the context of Rényi [13][14][15], Tsallis [16][17][18][19], and Kaniadakis statistics [20][21][22]. Very recently, a connection between Jackson, Tsallis, and Hausdorff approaches in the context of generalized statistical mechanics was proposed [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, several generalized approaches have been proposed to deal with erratic data [ 26 – 30 ]. Thus, generalized distributions based on the Rényi, Tsallis and Kaniadakis statistics have generated objective functions robust to erratic noise [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 and q = 2 limits, respectively. Indeed, generalizations of Gauss' law of error based on the foundations of statistical physics have been successfully applied to perform robust physical parameters' estimation in non-linear geophysical problems, such as misfit functions based on Student's t distribution [18][19][20], deformed Gaussian distributions [21][22][23][24][25], generalized maximum likelihood approaches [26][27][28], non-parametric methods [29], normalized-based objective functions [30,31], Wasserstein metric from the optimal transport distance [32][33][34], matching filter techniques [35], as well as in the Re ´nyi framework [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%