Proceedings of the 1st Annual ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on User Interface Software 1988
DOI: 10.1145/62402.62405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensions to C for interface programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of specification languages for describing WIMP and other previous generations of user interfaces has been developed, and user interface management systems have been built based on them [Myers 1995], using approaches such as BNF or other grammar-based specifications [Olsen 1992;Reisner 1981;Rhyne 1988;Shneiderman 1982], state transition diagrams [Jacob 1983a;Newman 1968], event handlers [Flecchia and Bergeron 1987;Hill 1986], declarative specifications [Olsen 1992], frames [Szekely 1987], and others [Foley et al 1989;Green 1985;Kasik 1982;Myers 1988;Sibert et al 1986;Yunten and Hartson 1985]. For example, although BNF had been a good match for programming languages or batch command interfaces, interactive, moded graphical interfaces were perhaps better captured by state transition diagram-based approaches [Jacob 1983b]; and modern modeless WIMP interfaces fit a coroutine-based model [Jacob 1986].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of specification languages for describing WIMP and other previous generations of user interfaces has been developed, and user interface management systems have been built based on them [Myers 1995], using approaches such as BNF or other grammar-based specifications [Olsen 1992;Reisner 1981;Rhyne 1988;Shneiderman 1982], state transition diagrams [Jacob 1983a;Newman 1968], event handlers [Flecchia and Bergeron 1987;Hill 1986], declarative specifications [Olsen 1992], frames [Szekely 1987], and others [Foley et al 1989;Green 1985;Kasik 1982;Myers 1988;Sibert et al 1986;Yunten and Hartson 1985]. For example, although BNF had been a good match for programming languages or batch command interfaces, interactive, moded graphical interfaces were perhaps better captured by state transition diagram-based approaches [Jacob 1983b]; and modern modeless WIMP interfaces fit a coroutine-based model [Jacob 1986].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%