2015
DOI: 10.1287/moor.2014.0658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensions of the Cav(u) Theorem for Repeated Games with Incomplete Information on One Side

Abstract: Abstract. This work is devoted to extend several asymptotic results concerning repeated games with incomplete information on one side. The model we consider is a generalization of the classical model of Aumann and Maschler [4] to infinite action spaces and partial information. We prove an extension of the classical "Cav(u)" Theorem in this model for both the lower and upper value functions using two different methods: respectively a probabilistic method based on martingales and a functional one based on appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scheme resembles the one used by De Meyer and Marino (2005) [8] to derive an upper bound for the value of the discrete market model. We start from the recurrent equation V N +1 (p) = T [V N ](p) in the form from Gensbittel (2015) [18] and construct an explicit non-negative invariant function h of the Shapley operator T using the Kantorovich metric. Monotonicity ideas of De Meyer and Marino imply that h is an upper bound for V N .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The scheme resembles the one used by De Meyer and Marino (2005) [8] to derive an upper bound for the value of the discrete market model. We start from the recurrent equation V N +1 (p) = T [V N ](p) in the form from Gensbittel (2015) [18] and construct an explicit non-negative invariant function h of the Shapley operator T using the Kantorovich metric. Monotonicity ideas of De Meyer and Marino imply that h is an upper bound for V N .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two items immediately follow from (3.1). To prove the third item we take in (3.1) a constant martingale p (n) ≡ p. For such martingale P = δ p , where δ p is the Dirac δ-measure at p. The game G 1 (δ p ) can be identified with the non-revealing game Γ 1 (p) (see Gensbittel (2015) [18]). Hence by almost-fairness V 1 (δ p ) = 0 that implies the third item.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As we explain below, our characterization is a generalization of that result. Similar ideas have been used elsewhere in the literature on dynamic games with incomplete information; see, for example, De Meyer (2010) or Gensbittel (2015). (We are grateful to a referee for these examples.…”
Section: Characterization Of Valuementioning
confidence: 88%