2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10444-018-9630-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensions of planar GC sets and syzygy matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the sequel we will need the following characterization of GC n set X , with #M (X ) = n − 1, due to Carnicer and Godés (see [10], Section 5, Case d=3, for a proof detail): Let us denote by dd 1 , dd 2 , dd 3 , the lines passing through the latter triples, respectively, and call them DD-lines. Also, the nodes D i are called D-nodes.…”
Section: Defect 3 Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the sequel we will need the following characterization of GC n set X , with #M (X ) = n − 1, due to Carnicer and Godés (see [10], Section 5, Case d=3, for a proof detail): Let us denote by dd 1 , dd 2 , dd 3 , the lines passing through the latter triples, respectively, and call them DD-lines. Also, the nodes D i are called D-nodes.…”
Section: Defect 3 Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A promising approach, based on methods from algebraic geometry, was introduced in [12] and suggests to consider so-called syzygy matrices that capture information about the structure of the underlying interpolation problem. In this paper, which is a continuation of [8,9], we collect further information about these syzygy matrices and explicitly show their behavior in certain cases of a given defect. Even if this is not yet a proof of the conjecture we consider these results useful for further studying this connection between interpolation problems and the associated syzygy matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%