1987
DOI: 10.1017/s0013091500026766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensions, crossed modules and internal categories in categories of groups with operations

Abstract: In [6] Brown and Spencer noted that internal categories within the category of groups are equivalent to crossed modules. As they remarked, this result was known to various others before them, but it had not until then appeared in print. That paper led me to investigate the question of which algebraic categories, C, were such that a similar result held i.e. internal categories in C are equivalent to crossed modules of the appropriate type. The resulting work was written up in 1980 but was not submitted for publ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
158
0
9

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
158
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of the definition of categories of groups with operations comes from Higgins [14] and Orzech [23]; and the definition below is from Porter [25] and Datuashvili [13, p. 21], which is adapted from Orzech [23].…”
Section: Groups With Operations and Internal Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The idea of the definition of categories of groups with operations comes from Higgins [14] and Orzech [23]; and the definition below is from Porter [25] and Datuashvili [13, p. 21], which is adapted from Orzech [23].…”
Section: Groups With Operations and Internal Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal category in C is defined in [25] as follows. We follow the notations of Section 1 for groupoids.…”
Section: Such a Category Is Called A Category Of Topological Groups Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations