IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/aspaa.2005.1540171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension of the multi-channel Wiener filter with ITD cues for noise reduction in binaural hearing aids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0
5

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The second term in the distortion (18) can thus be written as It corresponds to the distortion of the innovation process and also follows from [40]. Using (18), the achieved distortion directly evaluates as , demonstrating the optimality of the encoding architecture depicted in Fig. 4. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second term in the distortion (18) can thus be written as It corresponds to the distortion of the innovation process and also follows from [40]. Using (18), the achieved distortion directly evaluates as , demonstrating the optimality of the encoding architecture depicted in Fig. 4. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the orthogonality principle, the distortion achieved by this method can be decomposed as (18) Moreover where (a) follows from the successive conditioning property of conditional expectation and the fact that is a function of , (b) from the fact that in the jointly Gaussian case and from the linearity of conditional expectation and (c) from the successive conditioning property of conditional expectation and our jointly Gaussian assumption. The second term in the distortion (18) can thus be written as It corresponds to the distortion of the innovation process and also follows from [40]. Using (18), the achieved distortion directly evaluates as , demonstrating the optimality of the encoding architecture depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first category mostly consists of multichannel algorithms, therein combining spatial and spectral filtering, which attempt to reduce noise with an additional constraint on auditory scene preservation [3][4][5]. These algorithms are commonly designed by modifying the noise-reduction-related cost functions such that the binaural cues are kept undistorted [3,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms are commonly designed by modifying the noise-reduction-related cost functions such that the binaural cues are kept undistorted [3,6,7]. It has been shown that the binaural multichannel Wiener filter (MWF) [8] and the binaural minimum-variance distortionlessresponse (MVDR) beamformer [9,10] can preserve the binaural cues of the speech components, whereas the binaural cues of the noise components will be distorted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So different binaural noise reduction techniques have been proposed for enhancement of the target signal arriving from any arbitrary direction (i.e., sound localization). These binaural noisereduction strategies are based on spectral subtraction [31], statistical methods [32], and multichannel Wiener filtering (MWF) [33], [34]. The majority of the reported binaural noise-reduction techniques is fully exploiting this binaural unmasking effect to further improve speech intelligibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%