1998
DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199802000-00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension of Sensory Blockade After Thoracic Epidural Administration of a Test Dose of Lidocaine at Three Different Levels

Abstract: After evaluating the extension and pattern of sensory blockade in high, mid, and low thoracic epidural analgesia, the authors suggest that it is safe to use similar dosage regimens in all three regions, and that in high thoracic epidural analgesia, it is important to insert the epidural catheter at the level of the intended cranial border of blockade.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that after TOF stimulation was applied at the ulnar nerve, the thumb did not return to the baseline prior to the ®rst three twitches (T1±T3) [2,12]. The famous fault of the accelographic measurement, namely that the accelographic TOF ratio tends to be higher than the mechanical TOF ratio is probably due to`baseline displacement' of the thumb [2,12], and the degree of baseline ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ displacement becomes less as the stimulating current decreases [12]. Hence, we presume that when the TOF ratio is monitored accelographically at the great toe at a low current, the degree of baseline displacement would become less, resulting in a lower TOF ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that after TOF stimulation was applied at the ulnar nerve, the thumb did not return to the baseline prior to the ®rst three twitches (T1±T3) [2,12]. The famous fault of the accelographic measurement, namely that the accelographic TOF ratio tends to be higher than the mechanical TOF ratio is probably due to`baseline displacement' of the thumb [2,12], and the degree of baseline ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ displacement becomes less as the stimulating current decreases [12]. Hence, we presume that when the TOF ratio is monitored accelographically at the great toe at a low current, the degree of baseline displacement would become less, resulting in a lower TOF ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that after TOF stimulation was applied at the ulnar nerve, the thumb did not return to the baseline prior to the ®rst three twitches (T1±T3) [2,12]. The famous fault of the accelographic measurement, namely that the accelographic TOF ratio tends to be higher than the mechanical TOF ratio is probably due to`baseline displacement' of the thumb [2,12], and the degree of baseline ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…displacement becomes less as the stimulating current decreases [12]. Hence, we presume that when the TOF ratio is monitored accelographically at the great toe at a low current, the degree of baseline displacement would become less, resulting in a lower TOF ratio.…”
Section: R E T R a C T E Dmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Despite the large volume of the solution used, 20 mL, 75 mg of anesthetic is not considered a high dose, and this dilution was used because this procedure does not require intense muscle relaxation. A recent study 11 demonstrated that the median thoracic approach, such as the one used in the present study, tends to present greater caudal dispersion of the local anesthetic, justifying the use of larger volumes. A high blockade can affect hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, which was not detected in our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%