2003
DOI: 10.1115/1.1617287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension of Oxley’s Analysis of Machining to Use Different Material Models

Abstract: The aim of the present work is to extend the applicability of Oxley’s analysis of machining to a broader class of materials beyond the carbon steels used by Oxley and co-workers. The Johnson-Cook material model, history dependent power law material model and the Mechanical Threshold Stress (MTS) model are used to represent the mechanical properties of the material being machined as a function of strain, strain rate and temperature. A few changes are introduced into Oxley’s analysis to improve the consistency b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The predictions of temperature distribution in machining AISI 1045 steel and Al 6082-T6 aluminum were made in multiple tests under various cutting conditions. As given in Table 1, the J-C model constants of AISI 1045 steel and Al 6082-T6 aluminum were separately adopted from the literature, in which split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests were conducted to determine the model constants [37,40]. The cutting conditions, including cutting velocity, depth of cut, width of cut, rake angle, and experimental measurements of force and chip thickness, are given in Table 2 [36,37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The predictions of temperature distribution in machining AISI 1045 steel and Al 6082-T6 aluminum were made in multiple tests under various cutting conditions. As given in Table 1, the J-C model constants of AISI 1045 steel and Al 6082-T6 aluminum were separately adopted from the literature, in which split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests were conducted to determine the model constants [37,40]. The cutting conditions, including cutting velocity, depth of cut, width of cut, rake angle, and experimental measurements of force and chip thickness, are given in Table 2 [36,37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental forces were measured using a piezoelectric dynamometer in three mutually perpendicular directions. The cutting force and thrust force were then obtained based on cutting geometry [36,37]. The chip thicknesses were measured using a micrometer [37].…”
Section: Experimental Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ancak, bu model ikincil deformasyon bölgesindeki şekil değiştirmenin etkisini içermemektedir. Abidi-Sedeh vd [7,8] kesme kuvvetlerini ve sıcaklıkları tahmin etmek için JohsonCook malzeme modelini [9], geçmişbağımlı üs kanunu modelini ve mekanik eşik gerilme modelini kullanarak Oxley' …”
Section: Gi̇ri̇ş (Introduction)unclassified