2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-023-08054-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension of MEREC-CRADIS methods with double normalization-case study selection of electric cars

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the results obtained using the entropy-AROMAN framework, a comparison was made with other the MCDM models, such as the multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) [ 56 ], proximity indexed value (PIV) [ 57 ], and compromise ranking of alternatives from distance to ideal solution (CRADIS) [ 58 ] methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the results obtained using the entropy-AROMAN framework, a comparison was made with other the MCDM models, such as the multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) [ 56 ], proximity indexed value (PIV) [ 57 ], and compromise ranking of alternatives from distance to ideal solution (CRADIS) [ 58 ] methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their paper, they selected the electric car that best met the set goals using Promethee II (protracted method that requires a priori knowledge of the criteria weights II). Puška et al [36] revealed the possibility of introducing electric vehicles to reduce the impact on the environment. They selected electric vehicles in order to achieve this goal, using the DNMEREC (Double Normalization Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) and DNCRADIS (Double Normalization Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution) methods.…”
Section: Application Of Multi-criteria Methods In the Selection Of El...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are some methods that use double normalization. Puska et al (2023) declare that the ranking of alternatives is more stable when implementing methods with double normalization than methods with one more time normalization. By this fact, researchers of this article make a decision to use a method for ranking with this property.…”
Section: Dncradismentioning
confidence: 99%