2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-16684-6_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension of HyperAlgebra to SuperHyperAlgebra and Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlgebra (Revisited)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation between the n-closed graphs of subspace graph topology and the ambient graph topological space can be verified. Some significant works in a similar area can be found in [8,9]. All these facts highlights the wide scope for further investigation in the area concerned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The relation between the n-closed graphs of subspace graph topology and the ambient graph topological space can be verified. Some significant works in a similar area can be found in [8,9]. All these facts highlights the wide scope for further investigation in the area concerned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…means to split C into three parts (two parts opposite to each other, and another part which is the neutral / indeterminacy between the opposites), as pertinent to neutrosophy {(< A >, < neutA >, < antiA >), or with other notation (T, I, F )}, meaning cases where C is partially true (T ), partially indeterminate (I), and partially false (F ). While anti-sophication of C means to totally deny C (meaning that C is made false on its whole domain) (for detail see Smarandache [21,22,24,25]). Neutro-sophication of an axiom on a given set X, means to split the set X into three regions such that: on one region the axiom is true (we say degree of truth T of the axiom), on another region the axiom is indeterminate (we say degree of indeterminacy I of the axiom), and on the third region the axiom is false (we say degree of falsehood F of the axiom), such that the union of the regions covers the whole set, while the regions may or may not be disjoint, where (T, I, F ) is different from (1, 0, 0) and from (0, 0, 1).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smarandache in [23] revisited the notions of neutroalgebras and antialgebras, where he studied partial algebras, Universal algebras, Effect algebras and Boole ′ s partial algebras, and showed that neutroalgebras are generalization of partial algebras. Further, he extended the classical hyperalgebra to n-ary hyperalgebra and its alternatives n-ary neutrohyperalgebra and n-ary antihyperalgebra [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• On the Figure (13), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic 1-failed SuperHyperForcing, is up. There's neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge.…”
Section: T a (X) = Min[t A (V I )T A (V J )] Vivj ∈ X I A (X) = Min[i...mentioning
confidence: 99%