Extension fractures of the distal radius in patients older than 50: a prospective randomized study comparing fixation using mixed pins or a palmar fixed-angle plate

Marcheix, Pierre-Sylvain; Dotzis, A.; Benkö, P.-E.; Siegler, J.; Arnaud, J.; Charissoux, J.-L.

doi:10.1177/1753193410364179

Cited by 76 publications

(60 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite positive results for internal fixation, debate exists as to whether this technique represents first line treatment for displaced, unstable fractures. Marcheix compared palmar fixed angle locking plate fixation to Kirshner wire fixation in a prospective randomized trial, reporting improved functional results (DASH and Herzog scores), with a plate, with better maintenance of reduction [21]. However, equivalent functional scores have also been reported when comparing locking plate fixation to external fixation [22,23], or to conservative treatment [24].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional Outcome and Complications at 2.5 Years Following Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Distal radius fractures are increasingly treated by internal fixation, but there have been relatively few studies relating to functional outcome at 12 months or more. The aim of this study was to ascertain the patient reported function of the wrist at a minimum of 12 months following fixation of a distal radius fracture, the time taken to return to work, and the complication rate. We conducted a retrospective review of 187 consecutive patients treated by a specialist hand and wrist trauma team at a tertiary referral unit over a 5 year period. Mean age was 57.3 years (range 16-93). Median time to surgery was 4 days (interquartile range 2-9). Median follow up was 31 months (interquartile range 23-41 months). The median PRWE score was 3; (range 0-83). There was no difference in outcome in patients who had surgery delayed by greater than 2 weeks (p>0.05). The median time to return to work was 5 weeks (interquartile range 1-8 weeks). There were 15 complications (8 %) including 3 tendon injuries. We have demonstrated an early return to work in patients who were employed, a low complication rate, and highly favourable functional outcomes at a mean of 30 months postoperatively. We recommend the use of the DVR plate and involvement of a dedicated hand and wrist trauma team for treatment of unstable fractures of the distal radius.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional Outcome and Complications at 2.5 Years Following Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There were no differences in wrist extension, pronation, radial deviation, or ulnar deviation at 3 months or final followup. Wrist ROM was reported as an outcome in five trials [12,18,21,29,37], four of which reported sufficient information to enable pooling. Radial deviation and ulnar deviation were reported in only two of these trials [12,37].…”

Section: Functional Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to US Medicare data, internal fixation is the most common surgical intervention for distal radius fracture in the United States, followed closely by percutaneous pinning with K-wires [3]. To our knowledge, there have been no meta-analyses comparing these two common interventions despite multiple trials on the topic having been published [5,12,18,21,29,30,37].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Are Volar Locking Plates Superior to Percutaneous K-wires for Distal Radius Fractures? A Meta-analysis

Chaudhry

Kleinlugtenbelt

Mundi

et al. 2015

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Distal radius fractures are common, costly, and increasing in incidence. Percutaneous K-wire fixation and volar locking plates are two of the most commonly used surgical treatments for unstable dorsally displaced distal radius fractures. However, there is uncertainty regarding which of these treatments is superior. Questions/purposes We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine whether patients treated with volar locking plates (1) achieved better function (2) attained better wrist motion, (3) had better radiographic outcomes, and (4) had fewer complications develop than did patients treated with K-wires for dorsally displaced distal radius fractures. Methods We performed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE (inception to 2014, October Week 2), EMBASE (inception to 2014, Week 42), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify relevant randomized controlled trials; we supplemented these searches with manual searches. We included studies of extraarticular and intraarticular distal radius fractures. Adjunctive external fixation was acceptable as long as the intent was to use only K-wires where possible and external fixation was used in less than 25% of the procedures. We considered a difference in the DASH scores of 10 as the minimal clinically important difference. We performed quality assessment with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and evaluated the strength of recommendations using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Seven randomized trials with a total of 875 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Results Patients treated with volar locking plates had slightly better function than did patients treated with K-wires as measured by their DASH scores at 3 months (mean difference [MD], 7.5; 95% CI, 4.4-10.6; p \ 0.001) and 12 months (MD, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.3; p = 0.004). Neither of these differences exceeded the a priori-determined threshold for clinical importance (10 points). There was a small early advantage in flexion and supination in the volar locking plate group (3.7°[95% CI, 0.3°-7.1°; p = 0.04] and 4.1°[95% CI, 0.6°-7.

show abstract

“…The objective measures are consistently better with internal fixation, but the outcome measures are very similar between operative and nonoperative treatment groups. 99,[103][104][105] A more specific outcome measure for fracture treatment is needed and is a potential for further study. The DASH outcome measure may not be appropriate for distal radius fractures in the older patient population.…”

Section: Distal Radius Fractures (H Hoyen and S Mears)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Guide to Improving the Care of Patients With Fragility Fractures

Bukata

DiGiovanni

Friedman

et al. 2011

Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ForewordFragility fractures, low-energy injuries that occur from a fall from a standing or lower height, represent a serious public health problem. After age 50, the lifetime risk of having a fragility fracture is 33% for an American woman and 20% for a man. 1 In the United States, 2.1 million people will suffer a fragility fracture each year.1 The incidence of fragility fractures increases steeply after age 65.2 Osteoporosis is present in most patients with a fragility fracture.Hip fractures are the most serious in terms of cost and morbidity. The average cost of inpatient care for a hip fracture in 2005 was $33 962.3 The lifetime risk of having a hip fracture is 6% for men and 17.5% for women. Although the mortality risk after a hip fracture is much higher for a man, a woman's risk of dying from a hip fracture is high and exceeds the lifetime risk of death from breast cancer, uterine cancer, and ovarian cancer combined. For those who survive after a hip fracture, most do not regain their preinjury level of function, and 30% lose their independence. This loss of independence is greatly feared by patients and is very costly to patients and society.Although a hip fracture may have the most serious consequences, other bones, such as the wrist, shoulder, ankle, pelvis, and spine, frequently fracture in the osteoporotic patient. For example, the lifetime risk of a forearm or vertebral compression fracture is 16% and 15.6%, respectively, for a woman and 2.5% and 5%, respectively, for a man. 4 These statistics clearly show that fragility fractures are a major problem facing American society today, 5 and the care of such fractures presents an even greater challenge, in part because the quality of care delivered in the United States varies widely, even within one region. Many such fractures are treated in an outpatient setting, although some may be treated in the inpatient hospital setting. However, the quality of care for seniors with fragility fractures receives relatively little attention. In 2004, the United States Surgeon General issued a comprehensive report calling for health professionals to make significant improvements in our nation's bone health, and an improvement in the system and methods of care was suggested. 5There has been little written on the subject of improving the system of care delivery in the United States.The goals of this blue book are to review the methods used in inpatient and outpatient care, as well as rehabilitation of the patient with a fragility fracture. We discuss evidence-based best care models and, where evidence is lacking, present expert opinions in an effort to improve the standard and the quality of care for the patient with a fragility fracture. We hope that this monograph will provide guidance to physicians, nurses, rehabilitation therapists, other health care providers, and administrators.Stephen L. Kates, MD Editor-in-Chief Simon C. Mears, MD, PhD

show abstract

Extension fractures of the distal radius in patients older than 50: a prospective randomized study comparing fixation using mixed pins or a palmar fixed-angle plate

Cited by 76 publications

References 26 publications

Functional Outcome and Complications at 2.5 Years Following Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

Functional Outcome and Complications at 2.5 Years Following Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

Are Volar Locking Plates Superior to Percutaneous K-wires for Distal Radius Fractures? A Meta-analysis

A Guide to Improving the Care of Patients With Fragility Fractures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About