2019
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2019.1696092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending the scoping review framework: a guide for interdisciplinary researchers

Abstract: under the supervision of Dr. Marijke Taks. Georgia researches the relationship between passive consumption of sport and active sport participation, primarily among youth populations. She also researches the impacts of sport events on local communities.Marijke Taks is a professor in the School of Human Kinetics at the University of Ottawa. Dr.Taks' area of expertise is in socio-economic aspects of sport and leisure. Her current research focusses particularly on impacts, outcomes and leveraging of small and medi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These conversations and deliberations resulted in the production of outputs that went beyond the ones that would normally be produced. Much like Teare and Taks (2019), our work thus highlights and illustrates the potential for distinct academic disciplines to develop a mutually complementary relation. The novel insight we gained from our endeavours formed the basis for a paper that we jointly prepared for submission to a Human Computer Interaction conference (Perez et al, 2019), as well as other ongoing collaborations.…”
Section: Group Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…These conversations and deliberations resulted in the production of outputs that went beyond the ones that would normally be produced. Much like Teare and Taks (2019), our work thus highlights and illustrates the potential for distinct academic disciplines to develop a mutually complementary relation. The novel insight we gained from our endeavours formed the basis for a paper that we jointly prepared for submission to a Human Computer Interaction conference (Perez et al, 2019), as well as other ongoing collaborations.…”
Section: Group Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Next, the authors adopted the search strategy utilized by Filo et al ( 2015 ) and employed a systematic manual search, which Teare and Taks ( 2020 ) recommended for increasing the rigor of a systematic literature review. This search involved the researchers visiting the websites of every journal that appeared in the list of articles and manually searching the journal sites for articles that did not appear in the database search (Teare and Taks, 2020 ). The researchers viewed the table of contents for every issue of the journals from 1999 to 2018.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per Teare and Taks (2020), there are three steps involved in conducting a systematic manual search: (1) selecting the top fieldspecific journals (as determined by impact factors) within the specified time frame to begin the search, (2) screening all issues for relevant articles (i.e., two rounds of screening of titles and abstracts, followed by full texts), and (3) examining the reference lists of the identified articles for additional relevant journals. The same process is then completed for the identified journals, and a full journal search of these new journals is performed until no new journals arise (Teare and Taks, 2020).…”
Section: Systematic Manual Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…only sport management journals. In fact, as identified by Teare and Taks (2020), the systematic manual search is particularly useful when conducting scoping reviews on interdisciplinary topics such as the one in the present study, as it is able to identify journals and articles from several different domains. Teare and Taks (2020) suggest that this could be due to the varying terminology used in different domains to investigate a similar topic that might not be captured by the key words used in a database search.…”
Section: Identifying Relevant Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation