2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending the predictions of chemical mechanisms for hydrogen combustion: Comparison of predicted and measured flame temperatures in burner-stabilized, 1-D flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, even more important, different models have different predictive abilities even if they were validated against similar or the same commonly accepted sets of laboratory experiments, as it was emphasized by Burke et al [33]. Independent comparison of detailed kinetic schemes for hydrogen combustion clearly reveals these differences as demonstrated by, e.g., Sepman et al [34], Weydahl et al [35] and Bezgin et al [36]. Weydahl et al [35] attempted direct comparison of the most important reactions in the following models: GRI-mech [15], Davis et al [37], Konnov [6], Li et al [32], Ó Conaire et al [9], Williams [38], and Leeds [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, even more important, different models have different predictive abilities even if they were validated against similar or the same commonly accepted sets of laboratory experiments, as it was emphasized by Burke et al [33]. Independent comparison of detailed kinetic schemes for hydrogen combustion clearly reveals these differences as demonstrated by, e.g., Sepman et al [34], Weydahl et al [35] and Bezgin et al [36]. Weydahl et al [35] attempted direct comparison of the most important reactions in the following models: GRI-mech [15], Davis et al [37], Konnov [6], Li et al [32], Ó Conaire et al [9], Williams [38], and Leeds [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flame temperature is varied by changing the mass flux through the burner while keeping the fuel/air ratio constant (Mokhov and Levinsky, 2000;Sepman et al, 2011). Three equivalence ratios, ϕ, are studied here, ϕ=0.8, 1 and 1.3.…”
Section: Burner System and Gas Supplymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three equivalence ratios, ϕ, are studied here, ϕ=0.8, 1 and 1.3. Since prior studies (Mokhov and Levinsky, 2000;Sepman et al, 2013Sepman et al, , 2011 showed that the measured maximum temperatures and those determined by solving the one-dimensional governing equations for A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 6 burner-stabilized flames agree to within 50 K, here we compute the flame temperature. The results obtained by using the code from the Cantera suite (Goodwin et al, 2015) with the GRI-Mech 3.0 chemical mechanism (Smith et al, n.d.) are shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Burner System and Gas Supplymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, various radiation models were evaluated while performing the numerical simulations. Temperature measurements using CARS were obtained in pure H 2 /air burner stabilized 1-D flames [26]. A sensitivity analysis of change in temperature with a change in mass flux was performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%