2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending the Link Transmission Model with non-triangular fundamental diagrams and capacity drops

Abstract: The original Link Transmission Model as formulated by Yperman et al. (2006) simulates traffic according to Lighthill-Whitham-Richards theory with a very small numerical error, yet only supports triangular fundamental diagrams. This paper relaxes that restriction in two steps. Firstly, we extend the model to handle any continuous concave fundamental diagram, and prove that this extension is still consistent with Lighthill-Whitham-Richards theory. Secondly, we extend the theory and model to handle a capacity dro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main feature of this model based the simplified theory of Newell (1993a; consists in using the characteristic speeds (free-flow and congested flow) to derive the upstream and downstream boundary conditions. Recently, extensions of the original LTM formulation have been proposed to allow for larger time steps (Himpe et al, 2016) and to consider non-triangular FDs with capacity drops (Gun et al, 2017) and initial conditions (Gun, 2018). In recent years, the LTM has become very popular for the dynamic network loading (DNL) procedure within the dynamic traffic assignment (DTA), where simulations can involve thousands of links, and where the solution only needs to be computed on the link boundaries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main feature of this model based the simplified theory of Newell (1993a; consists in using the characteristic speeds (free-flow and congested flow) to derive the upstream and downstream boundary conditions. Recently, extensions of the original LTM formulation have been proposed to allow for larger time steps (Himpe et al, 2016) and to consider non-triangular FDs with capacity drops (Gun et al, 2017) and initial conditions (Gun, 2018). In recent years, the LTM has become very popular for the dynamic network loading (DNL) procedure within the dynamic traffic assignment (DTA), where simulations can involve thousands of links, and where the solution only needs to be computed on the link boundaries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach is to explicitly incorporate capacity drop into the fundamental diagram of LWR, with two flow values around the critical density [2,5,14,[51][52][53]. Similar modifications have also been made on the cell transmission model (CTM), a popular timespace-discretized version of LWR with a triangular or trapezoidal fundamental diagram proposed by Daganzo [54].…”
Section: Capacity Drops In Macroscopic Traffic Simulations 221 First-...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have proposed methods to relax this restriction. For example, the LTM was extended to handle general concave fundamental diagrams 22 , and a concave piecewise linear fundamental diagram was used to send and receive flows to represent driving behaviour and environmental conditions Table 5. Table 7.…”
Section: Evacuation Simulation Via An Ltm Considering Different Watermentioning
confidence: 99%