1986
DOI: 10.1632/adfl.17.2.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending the Foreign Language Department

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The place of LSP in the foreign language curriculum has been the subject of considerable discussion since 1974. In the literature, LSP assumes the following curricular roles: 1) an innovative area within a department of Romance Languages (126); 2) a player in the changing role of the university language department (45); 3) an alternative for upper‐level language courses (117); 4) a model of how business German can be used for constructive change in the foreign language curriculum (20); 5) a way to expand foreign language offerings (26; 71; 96; 158); and 6) a major part of the foreign language curriculum of the future (56; 204). Various works examine other curricular issues such as course objectives, content, and tasks for LSP (67; 179); a design for basic language programs for special needs plus general proficiency (91); the opposition of some faculty members to the inclusion of LSP in the traditional foreign language course offerings (76); approaches to marketing business Spanish (86); and ways to design effective language training for professionals (207).…”
Section: Assessing the Research Base For Lspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The place of LSP in the foreign language curriculum has been the subject of considerable discussion since 1974. In the literature, LSP assumes the following curricular roles: 1) an innovative area within a department of Romance Languages (126); 2) a player in the changing role of the university language department (45); 3) an alternative for upper‐level language courses (117); 4) a model of how business German can be used for constructive change in the foreign language curriculum (20); 5) a way to expand foreign language offerings (26; 71; 96; 158); and 6) a major part of the foreign language curriculum of the future (56; 204). Various works examine other curricular issues such as course objectives, content, and tasks for LSP (67; 179); a design for basic language programs for special needs plus general proficiency (91); the opposition of some faculty members to the inclusion of LSP in the traditional foreign language course offerings (76); approaches to marketing business Spanish (86); and ways to design effective language training for professionals (207).…”
Section: Assessing the Research Base For Lspmentioning
confidence: 99%