2011
DOI: 10.2478/s11600-011-0021-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending the double-difference location technique to mining applications part I: Numerical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EDD location technique was originally proposed in order to include the specific demands of the mining seismic environment, such as event clustering (Gibowicz and Lasocki 2001;OrleckaSikora and Lasocki 2002) and continuous changing of the monitoring system (Mendecki and Sciocatti 1997;Rudzinski and Debski 2011), in the DD method. We expected the resulting algorithm to have a large enough spatial resolution to enable a detailed analysis of the structure of the spatial seismic clusters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The EDD location technique was originally proposed in order to include the specific demands of the mining seismic environment, such as event clustering (Gibowicz and Lasocki 2001;OrleckaSikora and Lasocki 2002) and continuous changing of the monitoring system (Mendecki and Sciocatti 1997;Rudzinski and Debski 2011), in the DD method. We expected the resulting algorithm to have a large enough spatial resolution to enable a detailed analysis of the structure of the spatial seismic clusters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using the Metropolis algorithm with settings as in Rudzinski and Debski (2011). No a priori information was used.…”
Section: Rudna Copper Mine Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In oint event location, events are relocated according to the location of the so-called ''master event'' (Douglas 1967). Relative location methods usually improve the accuracy of source location; however, they are strongly influenced by data quality, similarly to non-relative methods of location (Rudzinski and Debski 2011;Debski and Klejment 2016). The crucial factors are determination errors of the aforementioned parameters, like P or S wave onsets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%