2010
DOI: 10.1080/19312451003680525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending the Conversational Argument Coding Scheme in Studies of Argument Quality in Group Deliberations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Highly empathic responses may enhance the complainant’s and online brand community’s perceptions of interactional justice and signal politeness and courtesy, which may reduce the virality of negative eWOM. An engaged firm response also might include substantiated explanations, and the number of reasons offered has more influence than the actual content of those reasons on decision outcomes (Seibold, Lemus, and Kang 2010). When firms provide more substantiated arguments, it may enhance perceptions of response quality and effort among brand community audiences (e.g., “We could not assist you quickly because the store was extremely busy”).…”
Section: Conceptual Foundations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly empathic responses may enhance the complainant’s and online brand community’s perceptions of interactional justice and signal politeness and courtesy, which may reduce the virality of negative eWOM. An engaged firm response also might include substantiated explanations, and the number of reasons offered has more influence than the actual content of those reasons on decision outcomes (Seibold, Lemus, and Kang 2010). When firms provide more substantiated arguments, it may enhance perceptions of response quality and effort among brand community audiences (e.g., “We could not assist you quickly because the store was extremely busy”).…”
Section: Conceptual Foundations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the models control for community size, as previous research has shown that it reduces member participation (Butler, ). Moreover, as on the member level, a sufficient quantity and quality of participation in the community are necessary conditions for sustaining members’ involvement (Ludwig et al, ; Ransbotham and Kane, ; Seibold, Lemus, and Kang, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, social media messages with more developed arguments should be perceived as better, more informed statements, which also enhance the appeal of using and contributing for others (Seibold and Meyers, 2007) This conceptualization corresponds with communicative argumentation quality research, which demonstrates that the development of reasoning, rather than its strength, predicts decision outcomes (Seibold et al, 2010). Notably, a measure of quality based on speech acts related to the development of an argument supports deductions about the quality of a message, irrespective of its content.…”
Section: Decoding Quality Of the Messagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, a measure of quality based on speech acts related to the development of an argument supports deductions about the quality of a message, irrespective of its content. Therefore, it can address both types of messages that are typical of communication, namely, agreement/convergence-seeking and disagreement (Seibold et al, 2010, Seibold andMeyers, 2007). We argue that text mining causal and cognitive function words, which are symbolically reflective of the speech act of conscientious argument, can provide a reliable measure of contribution quality in user innovation communities and other social media contexts.…”
Section: Decoding Quality Of the Messagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation