2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.09.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending the area of investigation of fine versus coarse quartz optical ages from the Lower Danube to the Carpathian Basin

Abstract: 14Despite the general satisfactory performance of quartz in the single aliquot regeneration protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that, for all previously investigated samples with equivalent doses higher than~100e200 Gy, the equivalent doses obtained on coarse quartz were systematically higher than for the finer material; this is unexpected when considering that the natural dose rate to fine grains should be somewhat higher than that to coarser grains (mainly because of the alpha dose rate contribution to silt-sized grains), and implies that the cause of the discrepancy resides in the equivalent dose measurements. It is also important to note that for younger ages (with equivalent doses lying in the more linear part of the dose response curves) agreement has been found between the fine and coarse grain quartz ages Timar-Gabor et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It is important to note that, for all previously investigated samples with equivalent doses higher than~100e200 Gy, the equivalent doses obtained on coarse quartz were systematically higher than for the finer material; this is unexpected when considering that the natural dose rate to fine grains should be somewhat higher than that to coarser grains (mainly because of the alpha dose rate contribution to silt-sized grains), and implies that the cause of the discrepancy resides in the equivalent dose measurements. It is also important to note that for younger ages (with equivalent doses lying in the more linear part of the dose response curves) agreement has been found between the fine and coarse grain quartz ages Timar-Gabor et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This might also hint towards another process within quartz OSL measurements, which is not yet understood. Especially considering the differences between grains sizes (Timar-Gabor et al, 2015b;Timar-Gabor and Wintle, 2013) and differences between natural and laboratory growth curve shapes (e.g. Chapot et al, 2012;Timar-Gabor et al, 2015a), which both seem to start around 100-150 Gy, this problem becomes evident.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Quartz Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loess samples consisting of fine grains of quartz are thought to be the ideal material for optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating (Roberts, 2008), but recent studies indicate that this is not necessarily correct. Timar-Gabor et al (2012, 2015b found varying dose response curve (DRC) shapes for different grain sizes of quartz that led to age discrepancies. Moreover, disagreements between natural and laboratory-induced DRCs (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further problem when dating the quartz fraction may be different ages derived from different grain sizes. This was shown by various studies in the Lower Danube region and Carpathian Basin, in which contrasting luminescence ages were determined when dating the fine (4-11 lm) or coarse (63-125 lm) grain fraction of quartz in age ranges >40 ka (Timar-Gabor et al 2011, 2015bConstantin et al 2012Constantin et al , 2014. In these studies, the coarse grain ages appear to provide the more reliable ages, and the fine grain ages appear to be underestimated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This was shown by various studies in the Lower Danube region and Carpathian Basin, in which contrasting luminescence ages were determined when dating the fine (4–11 μm) or coarse (63–125 μm) grain fraction of quartz in age ranges >40 ka (Timar‐Gabor et al . , ; Constantin et al . , ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%