The field of nonadiabatic
dynamics has matured over the
last decade
with a range of algorithms and electronic structure methods available
at the moment. While the community currently focuses more on developing
and benchmarking new nonadiabatic dynamics algorithms, the underlying
electronic structure controls the outcome of nonadiabatic simulations.
Yet, the electronic-structure sensitivity analysis is typically neglected.
In this work, we present a sensitivity analysis of the nonadiabatic
dynamics of cyclopropanone to electronic structure methods and nonadiabatic
dynamics algorithms. In particular, we compare wave function-based
CASSCF, FOMO-CASCI, MS- and XMS-CASPT2, density-functional REKS, and
semiempirical MRCI-OM3 electronic structure methods with the Landau–Zener
surface hopping, fewest switches surface hopping, and ab initio multiple spawning with informed stochastic selection algorithms.
The results clearly demonstrate that the electronic structure choice
significantly influences the accuracy of nonadiabatic dynamics for
cyclopropanone even when the potential energy surfaces exhibit qualitative
and quantitative similarities. Thus, selecting the electronic structure
solely on the basis of the mapping of potential energy surfaces can
be misleading. Conversely, we observe no discernible differences in
the performance of the nonadiabatic dynamics algorithms across the
various methods. Based on the above results, we discuss the present-day
practice in computational photodynamics.