2001
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending the accuracy limits of prediction for side-chain conformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
184
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 371 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
184
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We modeled the parkin RING I domain structure with the JACKAL MOLECULAR MODELING PACKAGE (16), using the related human c-Cbl crystal structure (PDB ID code 1FBV) as a template. The alignment of c-Cbl and parkin RING I protein sequences was generated by SEGMENT ALIGN-MENT ALGORITHM (SEA) software (17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Mass Spectrometry (Ms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We modeled the parkin RING I domain structure with the JACKAL MOLECULAR MODELING PACKAGE (16), using the related human c-Cbl crystal structure (PDB ID code 1FBV) as a template. The alignment of c-Cbl and parkin RING I protein sequences was generated by SEGMENT ALIGN-MENT ALGORITHM (SEA) software (17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Mass Spectrometry (Ms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A way to overcome the search-space limitation was suggested by Mendes et al (52); it presents a rotamer as a continuous ensemble of conformations that cluster around the classic rigid rotamer. A different approach to expanding the search space was recently devised by Honig and coworkers (19), which achieved accurate predictions by using an extensive rotamer library containing over 7,560 members, in which bond lengths and bond angles were taken from the database rather than simply assuming idealized values. Further, the performance of CHARMM (53) was better than that of AMBER in that work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the side-chain prediction algorithm used for these decoy sets may not be optimal. Tests of rebuilding side chains with the SCAP method 53 led to better overall DFIRE-AA scores (results not shown). The other issue is that the fraction of native contacts may have, in analogy to a scoring function, a narrow funnel versus backbone rmsd.…”
Section: Decoy Set Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%