2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00605-013-0537-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending structures for Lie algebras

Abstract: Abstract. Let g be a Lie algebra, E a vector space containing g as a subspace. The paper is devoted to the extending structures problem which asks for the classification of all Lie algebra structures on E such that g is a Lie subalgebra of E. A general product, called the unified product, is introduced as a tool for our approach. Let V be a complement of g in E: the unified product g ♮ V is associated to a system (⊳, ⊲, f, {−, −}) consisting of two actions ⊳ and ⊲, a generalized cocycle f and a twisted Jacobi … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present paper continues our recent work [3,4] related to the above question (3), in its general form, namely the factorization problem and its converse, called the classifying complement problem, which consist of the following question: let g ⊂ L be a given Lie subalgebra of L. If a complement of g in L exists (that is a Lie subalgebra h such that L = g + h and g ∩ h = {0}), describe explicitly, classify all complements and compute the cardinal of the isomorphism classes of all complements (which will be called the factorization index [L : g] f of g in L). Our starting point is [4,Proposition 4.4] which describes all Lie algebras L that contain a given Lie algebra h as a subalgebra of codimension 1 over an arbitrary field k: the set of all such Lie algebras L is parameterized by the space TwDer(h) of twisted derivations of h. The pioneer work on this subject was performed by K.H. Hofmann: [12, Theorem I] describes the structure of n-dimensional real Lie algebras containing a given subalgebra of dimension n − 1.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The present paper continues our recent work [3,4] related to the above question (3), in its general form, namely the factorization problem and its converse, called the classifying complement problem, which consist of the following question: let g ⊂ L be a given Lie subalgebra of L. If a complement of g in L exists (that is a Lie subalgebra h such that L = g + h and g ∩ h = {0}), describe explicitly, classify all complements and compute the cardinal of the isomorphism classes of all complements (which will be called the factorization index [L : g] f of g in L). Our starting point is [4,Proposition 4.4] which describes all Lie algebras L that contain a given Lie algebra h as a subalgebra of codimension 1 over an arbitrary field k: the set of all such Lie algebras L is parameterized by the space TwDer(h) of twisted derivations of h. The pioneer work on this subject was performed by K.H. Hofmann: [12, Theorem I] describes the structure of n-dimensional real Lie algebras containing a given subalgebra of dimension n − 1.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The formula for the comultiplication of any such coalgebra (C * ⋆ k n ) * can be written down effectively by using (41) and (3). This observation shows that the GE-problem applied for finite dimensional algebras and finite dimensional vector spaces gives the answer at the level of finite dimensional coalgebras to what we have called the extending structures problem studied in [2,4,5] for Jacobi, Lie and respectively associative algebras.…”
Section: The Global Extension Problemmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Indeed, we will fix {1, x} as a basis in a two dimensional Jacobi algebra. The proof follows from the classical classification of 2-dimensional Lie algebras [34] and from the well known classification of 2-dimensional associative algebras [46] (for arbitrary fields see [7,Corollary 4.5]). Indeed, the classification follows by a routine computation based on checking the compatibility condition (6).…”
Section: Remarks 22mentioning
confidence: 99%