2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending rotation age for carbon sequestration: A cross-protocol comparison of North American forest offsets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on public opinion, it would be an valuable for forest managers to include the carbon benefits in their forestry profit predictions. In order to include carbon benefits in forest management, a number of previous studies have proposed what is known as the 'social rule' (Im et al 2007;Foley et al 2009;Hennigar et al 2008). Because the rotation period is important for forest management decision making and strongly affected by regional forest resources, some studies have focused on estimating how the optimum rotation period is affected by different carbon offset systems.…”
Section: Stand Age Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on public opinion, it would be an valuable for forest managers to include the carbon benefits in their forestry profit predictions. In order to include carbon benefits in forest management, a number of previous studies have proposed what is known as the 'social rule' (Im et al 2007;Foley et al 2009;Hennigar et al 2008). Because the rotation period is important for forest management decision making and strongly affected by regional forest resources, some studies have focused on estimating how the optimum rotation period is affected by different carbon offset systems.…”
Section: Stand Age Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the benefits of carbon sequestration by forests have been highlighted and carbon sequestration has been measured throughout the world: in the United States (Sakata 2005;Calish et al 1978;Foley et al 2009;Ehman et al 2002;Im et al 2007), Europe (Backèus et al 2005;Liski et al 2001;Matala et al 2009;Pohjola and Valsta 2007;Sivrikaya et al 2007;Kaipainen et al 2004;Seidl et al 2007), Canada (Hennigar et al 2008;Thompson et al 2009), Oceania (Campbell and Jennings 2004) and Asia (Ravendranath 1995;Han and Youn 2009). Forests not only have economic value through the production of commercial timber, but they also have other values to society including acting as carbon sinks, supporting biodiversity, and providing water protection (Pukkala 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of studies have examined the C storage effects of various rotation periods (e.g. see Liski et al 2001;Bravo et al 2008;Foley et al 2009;Thürig and Kaufmann 2010), thinning regimes (Wutzler et al 2006;Rotzer et al 2010;Ruiz-Peinado et al 2012), and other forest management options (Masera et al 2003;Thürig and Kaufmann 2010;Pérez-Cruzado et al 2012). However, few studies have analyzed the effects of wood-use strategies (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managing forests sustainably and accounting for their value as carbon sinks in terms of the biomass of forest trees, can make an important contribution to this goal. The public benefits arising from timber production and carbon sequestration in forested areas have recently been recognized in many parts of the world including the United States (Sakata 2005;Foley et al 2009;Ehman 2002;Im 2007), Europe (Backe'us et al 2005;Sivrikaya 2007; Kaipainen2004; Seidl et al 2007;Raymer et al 2009;Pohjola and Valsta 2007), Canada (Hennigar 2008;Thompson 2009;McKenney et al 2004), Oceania (Campbell 2004) and Asia (Ravend 1995;Han 2009). Forests not only have economic value from the commercial production of timber, but are also of value to the public through their important environmental functions including their roles as carbon sinks, contributing to biodiversity, and protecting water resources (Pukkala 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%