2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-09002-8_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending nn-UNet for Brain Tumor Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, for small tumors located on the vertex, we experienced that complex venous structures draining to the superior sagittal sinus or missing out on MR cut made prominent error in the U‐Net models; however, the application of nnU‐Net drastically reduced these errors. Although the efficacy of nnU‐Net, which scored the highest in the Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2021, is well known, its applicability for meningioma has yet to be published 33 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, for small tumors located on the vertex, we experienced that complex venous structures draining to the superior sagittal sinus or missing out on MR cut made prominent error in the U‐Net models; however, the application of nnU‐Net drastically reduced these errors. Although the efficacy of nnU‐Net, which scored the highest in the Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2021, is well known, its applicability for meningioma has yet to be published 33 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2014, deep learning algorithms have been extensively researched for tumor segmentation in the BraTS challenge [9,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Myronenko [32] won the BraTS 2018 competition by training an asymmetrical U-Net with a broader encoder and an additional variational decoder branch that provided further regularization.…”
Section: Tumor Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To find the optimal architecture and learning strategy, extensive ablation studies were conducted to test: U-Net depth, number of convolutional channels, decoder attention, residual connections, losses, and post-processing strategy. Similarly, [38] developed a novel brain tumor segmentation method by improving nnU-Net, including using a larger network, replacing batch normalization with group normalization, and using axial attention in the decoder. In addition, [39] proposed a trusted brain tumor segmentation network, which could generate robust segmentation results and reliable uncertainty estimates, modeled using subjective logic theory.…”
Section: Tumor Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the excellent performance of the U-Net architecture [ 33 ] for medical image segmentation, lots of the CNN-based [ 34 , 35 ] and almost all recently proposed Transformer-based medical image segmentation methods [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 36 , 37 , 38 ] adopted U-Net-like architectures to capture the global and local contextual information for each pixel. Futrega et al [ 34 ] carried out extensive ablation studies on several tricks to improve the performance of the U-Net architecture.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining the selected effective tricks, their optimized U-Net architecture took third place in the test phase of the BraTS 2021 [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ] segmentation competition. Luu et al [ 35 ] experimented with several modifications of the nn-UNet [ 39 ], and the modified nn-UNet won first place in the test phase of the BraTS 2021 segmentation competition. UNETR [ 8 ] uses ViT as the encoder and converts the features from four different stages of ViT to build hierarchical feature maps, which are fed into the decoder to generate the segmentation mask.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%