2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology 2008
DOI: 10.1109/wiiat.2008.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending a Defeasible Reasoner with Modal and Deontic Logic Operators

Abstract: Defeasible logic is a non-monotonic formalism that deals with incomplete and conflicting information. Modal logic deals with necessity and possibility, exhibiting defeasibility; thus, it is possible to combine defeasible logic with modal operators. This paper reports on the extension of the DR-DEVICE defeasible reasoner with modal and deontic logic operators. The aim is a practical defeasible reasoner that will take advantage of the expressiveness of modal logics and the flexibility to define diverse agent typ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article is based on previous work by the authors (Kontopoulos, Bassiliades, Governatori, & Antoniou, 2008) and reports on extending the DR-DEVICE first-order defeasible logic reasoner (Bassiliades, Antoniou, & Vlahavas, 2006) with reasoning capabilities on modal defeasible logic rule bases. Notice that in this work we focus mainly on deontic logic operators, without loss of generality, even if the techniques proposed can be applied to any modal logic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article is based on previous work by the authors (Kontopoulos, Bassiliades, Governatori, & Antoniou, 2008) and reports on extending the DR-DEVICE first-order defeasible logic reasoner (Bassiliades, Antoniou, & Vlahavas, 2006) with reasoning capabilities on modal defeasible logic rule bases. Notice that in this work we focus mainly on deontic logic operators, without loss of generality, even if the techniques proposed can be applied to any modal logic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%